July 1, 2025

Exacting methods are required to produce complex results. Even sequences are not optional with complex results. The same is true in sociology as in technology.

The courts use required methods for that reason. Results have to be produced in a stepwise manner.

Conservatives oppose methodologies being imposed upon them and pretend that effectiveness requires getting rid of impositions upon themselves including required methodologies.

So conservatives are defying required methods to get the results they want in dismantling the government, such as eliminating paper trails and visibility for their redesign of government and sociology. Instead of admitting the defiance and contempt, they claim to be improving. So there needs to be a clarification on the purpose and significance of methodologies.

Stripping away accountability with invisibility eliminates public awareness and involvement in the processes which are required for democracy. Why would a bunch of unaccountable and inexperienced rogues know how to improve upon evolved democracy? Of course, it is nothing but criminal contempt imposed as improvement.

But what if the libs created so much corruption that improvements must be radical—like break something and move rapidly, as in muzzle velocity? If so, why not some description of the difference with criticism allowed? Does open and accountable information with criticism corrupt a subject? So much so that no one can develop a discussion of the subject?

That's the implication of the "new normal" that began with Reaganism in 1981. Journalists said that Reagan said, if you need to explain, you are already a loser. That means the new normal is based on darkness as the source of invisible solutions to problems; and conservatives assume whims out of nowhere are required in place of described and evolved procedures.

Inherent in that assumption is reductionism stripping away complexities from problems and solutions. Even if the promoters of the conservative-instigated new normal were such geniuses that they could produce fixes for complex problems as instant whims, no one else could know what they are doing. That means a one-man-band is the fix for complex problems.

No one can get involved in processes that do not have explanations. If no one can get involved, there is no complexity. Why hire employees, if one person can produce infinite complexity instantly based on whims? It's because modern complexities require a lot more than whims out of nowhere.

As incompetent power mongers took over the social structures and converted them into power structures for their personal gain at everyone else's expense, they destroyed functionality. They bankrupt everything they touch and then need to rip everyone off for income.

Openness and accountability prevent that from happening. It was the darkness of concealment that allowed incompetents to hijack the social order.