Corrupters cannot acquire power without fraud. The reason why is because exploitation is a fraud process. Exploitation means starting with a potential source of power that someone else created and hijacking the process. The take-over of a process requires misrepresenting that process.

Fraud is a ladder that power mongers use for fake superiority. They can't use rationality, because it exposes them as incompetent corrupters. They can only use fraud, because there is no wrong way to produce fraud.

Why would anyone turn over their critical processes to incompetent corrupters? They wouldn't. Fraud is needed to pretend that it is not incompetent corrupters taking over critical functions but some sort of improvement in the process.

For that reason, corrupters are fixers. Corrupting is supposedly fixing something. Pretending that corrupting is fixing is the image of corrupters hijacking the social structures through fraud.

Truth is the only force corrupters cannot defeat. That's because truth is alignment upon the laws of the universe. With the universe behind truth, universal truth always exists to be tapped into for purposes. Truth always prevails over corruption to the extent that enough truth can be produced.

Therefore, corrupters must block out truth to perpetrate the fraud that is needed for hijacking social structures. The limitations to their success are based upon their ability to prevent truth from overcoming their schemes.

To a large extent, what corrupters are fighting over is their need to prevent truth from ending their schemes. Truth is their vulnerability; so it is fighting truth that is their primary preoccupation.

For those reasons, fraud is more about blocking out truth than producing a convincing form of reality. In fact, the more ridiculous the artificial reality (fraud) is, the more effectively it blocks truth.

That means fraud is not usually as much about convincing as imposing. Fraud must be imposed, not explained.

Preventing criticism is a major part of imposing fraud. There is never a justification for preventing criticism, because the process of criticizing will always lead to increased truth, even if critics are wrong. Explaining does that. Once the alternatives are considered, the truth becomes apparent.

In physics, relativity is the most extreme example. It is totally in conflict with the laws of the universe; yet it is imposed upon physicists to put frauds in control of physics. No significant criticism is allowed.

More relevant are the fake science and technology which are destroying energy and transportation systems. Those subjects were developed by blocking all criticism in the media.

About half of society was on each side of the global warming issue twenty years ago; but journalists railroaded the subject preventing criticism saying the science is settled and removing carbon dioxide from the air is too critical to waste time arguing over it.

Then the next level of corruption was to claim fake technology would fix the problem. Renewable energy is so worthless that no relevant progress has been made in several years.

The focus shifted to electric vehicles which can never be anything but a toy for the rich but will supposedly solve all problems related to energy and transportation in the near future.

The essential element of those frauds is not in the science and technology, which would be easy to criticize and correct, as many scientists and engineers have tried to do, but in the need for incompetent corrupters to perpetrate fraud to acquire power. They need to hijack the social structures to acquire power; and it can't be done without fraud.

Why were incandescent light bulbs outlawed and abolished to save electricity, while producing Bitcoins is allowed to waste more electricity than large cities use for each of the competitors for ripping off the dupes? To raise the price of electricity, which the lower classes can't afford but the rich can? Or to put incompetent power mongers in control of our lives by imposing fraud onto society? Both always go together.

Similarly, why is wasting more electricity and resources than anyone has ever heard of being allowed for fake artificial intelligence which has no value to most of society? The same reasons.
 
Frauds Can Never Explain

Any explanation shows contradictions that expose fraud as wrong. For that reason, frauds acquire a habit of never explaining. They get burned so many times with explanations that they withdraw and pretend that concealed knowledge is superior to explanations.

An example is physicists promoting the supposed greenhouse effect. Their first explanation is that an absorption dip in the graph is highly visible and absorption means heating, no ifs, ands or buts. They assume that explanation is so fool-proof that they can come out of hiding and promote it. But guess what. It shows how stupid they are.

What they miss is that absorption of radiation always produces heat, which they know; but all heat causes molecules to vibrate and emit radiation as a result. The molecules vibrate instantaneously, as absorbed radiation stretches bonds and moves the molecule. And just as the vibration is instantaneous, the resulting emission of radiation is instantaneous.

Every molecule in existence is vibrating, which is heat, and emitting radiation as a result. That radiation is broad-band, because the vibrations are highly varied when molecules are bumping into each other.

Carbon dioxide absorbs three narrow bands of radiation and instantly emits broad-band radiation as it does so. But the broad-band radiation disappears in the radiation emitted by all other molecules resulting in the origins of the energy being invisible due to mixing.

So incompetent physicists missed the instantaneous re-emission of the energy as broad-band radiation. How can they study physics and not know such simple facts? It's because physics contains so many errors that frauds take over physics without knowing a thing about the subject.

It shows that only real scientists can explain science; frauds cannot. Real scientists wouldn't think of demanding someone to trust them without explaining, so people can decide for themselves. No explanation, no truth. That means explanations are the definitive difference between fraud and truth.