January 7, 2023

Corrupters cannot accept realities as they are, because realities link together and expose corruption for what it is.

Why then don't realities end corruption? Because corrupters are driven by motives which are more important to them than realities.

The basic motive of corrupters is to get more out of life than the incompetence produces, which instantly puts them in conflict with the universe and requires their whole existence to be an attempt to win at their conflict with the universe. They are obsessed with being winners, because they can never be anything but losers.

A conflict with the universe taints all of a corrupters realities, not just some of it. But corrupters commiserate with each other and conspire against the universe. The mob effort gives corrupters the psychological encouragement to proceed in their impossible task.

The impossibility of the task of corrupters disappears in their ignorance, while the justification is enhanced by the power of the group. Power becomes the test of everything including truth, knowledge and justification.

Which is the introduction to the transposition of realities. A conflict with realities due to a conflict with the universe requires transposition of realities.

Transposition means taking the realities that apply to self and sticking them onto opponents. In it's simplest form it is what psychologists call projection—projecting guilt onto someone else as a defensive mechanism.

But transposition goes way beyond such projection in the attempt to reverse the meaning of all realities. Since the combination of realities exposes corrupters as the corrupters that they are, the meaning of all realities must be reversed in pretending that opponents are the ones getting realities wrong.

It's no easy task; so corrupters are characterized by their difficult task, much like carrying heavy weights around. The difficult task is not just in altering realities but generating a lot of force in the attempt to make the realities stick.

As a result, corrupters are very forceful persons—always imposing and creating conflicts. The conflicts are not aligned upon objective (external) realities, which always could use a degree of correcting and could therefore always create some conflicts. Instead, the conflicts are aligned upon the subjective (personal) realities of corrupters, while corrupters are disconnected from the objective realities created by the universe which defines life and the solutions to problems.

Corrupters are totally subjective in terms of being obsessed with their own personal problems. In place of attempts to solve problems for the good of all, corrupters are trying to correct their personal problems which have nothing to do with the good of all.

And abracadabra, that's what the conservative cause is. The conservative cause draws in corrupters in creating the group effort at turning the universe around for the personal gain of incompetents trying to prevail by mongering power over other persons.

Not the least meaning is that the conservative cause is not about politics, government, the good of society or solving problems. It's about imposing personal concerns onto everyone else in the attempt to turn the universe around.

Turning the universe around means taking the realities that apply to self and sticking them onto opponents in the attempt to prove that someone else has the problem instead of the corrupters who create the problem. That's transposing self-generated realities onto opponents.

One of the clearest examples is the harping by conservatives on cancel culture. Someone must have noticed that the only mechanism conservatives have is to cancel what others are doing. The art of Trump's deal consists of nothing but firing someone. He fired everyone he hired eventually. He hired them saying the were great, great and fired them saying they were morons.

The reason why that happens (why corrupters create a cancel culture) is because they have a mechanistic assumption (they live by mechanistic assumptions which substitute for rationality) which says they are what they are in contact with. Trump surrounds himself with gold paint based on the assumption that it makes him worth gold.

Therefore, if someone becomes a loser, a corrupter must disconnect from them, so it doesn't make themselves a loser. Disconnect from a loser who was previously assumed to be among the winners is not a simple task; so quite a bit of vehemence goes with the task, which, for Trump, requires a lot of name calling.

Since cancelling is the primary response of corrupters in disconnecting from losers, they needed to get the accusation of being cancel culture turned around by sticking it to enemies. So they have been harping on liberals creating a cancel culture. They align the fraud upon the criticism which liberals do a lot of pretending that criticism is cancelling. But criticism is correcting, which is not cancelling.

The examples which conservatives used for cancel culture were primarily focussed on university students complaining about something which resulted in professors getting fired, as if liberals were cancelling out professors for their personal grievances.

What was being omitted from those examples is that students don't fire anyone, only administrators can fire professors. Administrators of everything—corporations, organizations, bureaucracies and universities—have been aligning more and more with conservatives, as fascism overtakes the social order. The conservative response to problems is to fire someone, not the least reason being that they are incapable of producing rational evaluation which would not require firing anyone.

So the complaints and criticism of students, which are endlessly needed, resulted in examples of someone getting fired as the quick fix by incompetent, conservative administrators. That means it is not the liberals complaining and criticizing who create the cancel culture but the conservative administrators who need a quick fix for their dilemma who do the cancelling. And the result is that conservatives have their cancelling corruption transposed onto liberals.