January 12, 2023

Conservatives are trying to change normal to "a new normal." The universe defines life and the solutions to problems as normal. Not trying to solve problems in sustaining life is corruption. The definition of corruption is, that which destroys life.

It seems strange that conservatives could be so self-righteous in promoting such obvious corruptions. It's because they don't look at the literal meaning of their statements; they assume their orientation is correct and nonliteral words are needed to promote it. Their lies are assumed to be nonliteral promotion of correct realities.

The simplest element of that oddity is their disconnect from objective reality which normalizes nonliteral reality for them. They have to speak in terms of tangential reality, because they don't have a clue how literal realities should be aligned. It's alignment of the purpose that absorbs them, not the manner in which the realities are used to promote their purpose.

So the purpose which underlies the absurd realities is what really defines conservatives and their cause. That purpose has an exaggerated meaning for them due to its absurdity. It takes a lot of effort of impose absurdities onto society.

What enters the conscious awareness of corrupters, and not much does, is that the social order needs to be aligned differently than normal persons try to align it. The assumption of corrupters is that alignment needs to be based on power or status. Those with the most power as status need to be above those with less power or status. That concern seems to be so obvious that corrupters cannot understand or accept the normal assumptions that indicate otherwise.

So it's important to take a look at what normalcy is in that area. Normalcy is evaluation of worth in terms of—well, worth. Worth is constructivity and ability; but even so, worth is not the same as status in the normalcy world. That's because status is seldom relevant in the normalcy world. In fact, there is a degree of revulsion to the assumption that high-level power mongers should be given status, since they consistently show their worthlessness.

The reason why corrupters get oriented around power and status is because they strive for power and status to make up for their worthlessness. Corrupters assume they can adjust for their inadequacies by prevailing against other persons. It takes power to do that; so they monger power as their ticket to success in life.

With their success in life oriented around power and poorly developed realities, being disconnected from objective reality, it becomes extremely natural for corrupters to measure everyone in terms of their power and equate power with status. If status in not tacked onto power, then the value of power might not be adequately promoted.

So it seems strange to corrupters that assumed normal persons tend to overlook, if not defy, the importance of power and subsequent status in determining worth. And it is important for them to correct that problem, because their effort in generating their worth in terms of power is for nothing without an acceptance of power and status as worth.

In rudimentary terms, it seems logical to corrupters that the fittest survive, since biologists say evolution is based upon survival of the fittest. The fittest seem obviously to be those who prevail, in the simple-minded view of corrupters. So the human society needs correcting in promoting survival of the fittest, which is the same thing as power and status determining worth.

That's what Reagan was trying to say and what conservatives were trying to implement in creating "a new normal." "Morning in America," Reagan called it when getting elected a second time. The assumption was that the public had finally seen the light and aligned upon the conservative cause.

Therefore part B of the analysis becomes more important than is usually recognized. Part B is the ruination of man that conservatives produce in promoting their cause of aligning an artificial social structure upon power as status. We now see the result as fascism replacing democracy in the attempts to overthrow the government. It took forty years of Reaganism to put Trump in power with that purpose.

The cause-and-effect relationships are often not very apparent; so they need to be described. The purpose of power is to replace constructivity based on rationality with the ability to prevail over other persons. There are no elements of constructivity in that process. It's self-centered, feel-good motivation.

The visible manifestation of that purpose is what we see day in and day out in so-called partisan politics. It's not partisan, because the two sides are not equal by any criteria. One side is desperately trying to correct the destruction of government and a war against the lower classes, while the other side is trying to turn normalcy upside down to replace ordered existence including a government base on laws with destructive chaos using lies to justify it.
 
Combative Reductionism