June 3, 2025

Standards and methods determine the difference between constructivity and destructivity. Ignoring and defying standards and methods attempts to substitute destructivity for constructivity.

Corrupters sort of know that in a superficial way; but they expect to gain from destructivity which they assume is superficial. They assume critics are lost and misdirected in imposing perfectionism, while it takes a degree of (corruption) to accomplish anything, which they would never call corruption.

Among the endless problems with their ethic of corruption is that they never produce anything other than corruption. It takes a whole different relationship to reality and related "patterns and practices" to produce constructivity.

A little bit of corruption never happens, because it would run into conflict with constructivity and get nowhere. So it is all or none. And since a little bit accomplishes nothing, corrupters pull the stops out in trying to do the impossible with corruption.

The entire reasons why corrupters use corruption as their methodology is because constructivity is so demanding that they are losers when making such attempts. But corruption makes them winners, which causes them to assume corruption is the answer to everything. They don't know the difference between being winners and functioning constructively.

Incompetent corrupters become winners through domination to prevail through the use of force and violence. So winning means stomping someone else down, not doing something constructive.

Constructivity requires rationality as aligning upon the objective realities of the universe that define life an solutions to problems. It's demanding to determine the requirements of the universe and to get results aligned upon the requirements of the universe. Science is the most concerted method of determining the requirements; and engineering is the most concerted method of getting results from the information.