September 28, 2025

Corrupters rationalize their war against the lower classes as survival of the fittest. They actually believe they are accomplishing something in promoting the fittest in destroying vulnerable persons.

Decades ago, eugenics was ridiculed out of existence; but nothing changed in the motives of corrupters, because they assume there is a sociology to survival of the fittest regardless of genetics, though they continue to covertly promote the eugenics also.

Survival of the fittest was developed as a biological evolution concept and described by Darwin in his book "Origin of Species." It means evolution moves forward by allowing improvements to survive in more-fit organisms, where less-fit organisms do not survive so easily.

But that isn't the real reason why corrupters fight a war against the lower classes and vulnerable persons. The real reason is because they are losers where rationality exists due to their incompetence in relating to the complexities of objective realities. They replace rationality with domination through force and violence to make themselves winners by prevailing against other persons.

Trying to be winners through force and violence is a losing activity due to the opposition from victims and resulting truth which corrupters cannot defeat. They can temporarily defy truth, but it increases as a result, because truth is linking to the objective realities of the universe that define life and solutions to problems. Rationality is what that process is called; and corrupters hate rationality because of the truth it produces.

Since corruption must always be rationalized to diminish the truth that increases against it, a rationalization is contrived for the war against the lower classes. What corrupters latch onto to rationalize their force and violence against vulnerable persons is survival of the fittest. That means they tell themselves that misfits must be suppressed to prevent them from diminishing the status of the fittest persons; and winners are assumed to be the fittest.

One of the most obvious frauds of corrupters is their assumption that they are superior persons due to their prevailing against vulnerable persons, as if there were some brilliance and necessity in destroying vulnerable persons through force and violence.

Corrupters covertly try to teach the virtue and necessity of prevailing through force and violence; but due to opposing forces they must resort to the use examples with few direct words. They praise and promote force and violence to show its virtues and necessity.

What they can't quite eliminate is the obvious evidence of their incompetence and destructivity in pretending that they are superior persons and accomplishing something through destructivity.

What needs to be clarified is the more basic and abstract concept of what winning means. Is winning the result of incompetent and destructive persons prevailing against everyone else? Corrupters assume so, because they convince themselves, and no one else, that their rationalizations are truisms of existence.

What is superior about destructivity from incompetents? Corrupters actually believe there is an invisible element to their superiority which cannot be located or described but is revealed when they defeat opponents through force and violence. Isn't defeating winning?

So the essence of their fraud gets down to the difference between defeating and winning. What do corrupters win in defeating opponents through force and violence? They win an endless battle against the universe. But it takes some abstract understanding of what the universe consists of; so corrupters assume they are fighting their war against opponents who can be defeated rather than the objective realities of the universe which are not going to be ended.

The abstractions of definitions are replaced by the incompetence and destructivity of corrupters that do not have a value but destroy what others accomplish. Claiming and promoting destructivity as a superior process results in social ruin regardless of anyone's evaluation.