January 26, 2025

Basic reality is the reality upon which other realities depend. Science has the purpose of extending basic knowledge into unknown areas.

Basic philosophy is similar to science in explaining the more superficial realities. The only difference between science and basic philosophy is the method of acquiring evidence. Science uses instruments for measurement, while philosophy uses social examples for evidence. Basic philosophy can be more reliable than science, because the social examples are more visible, where data from instruments can be vague and difficult to interpret.

Logic is the closest thing to proof in any area. Science has no meaning without the five hundred years of accumulated knowledge of science. It's the logic of relationships between realities that determines scientific knowledge or philosophical knowledge.

Basic reality is more definitive than superficial reality, because many realities depend upon the basic realities. That set of relationships leaves no room for falseness. Any errors run into many conflicting realities which cannot be tailored.

For that reason, explanations are proof in the basic area. No explanations can be in error without obvious contradictions. So basic reality is simply explained, end of subject. Isn't that trite concept the abomination to be rejected by corrupters.

Proving is disproving to corrupters, because proof is the most conflicting reality to the perpetual endeavor of corrupters in rationalizing the virtues of corruption. For that reason there is no functional proof socially. Anyone who does not accept the obvious as fact cannot be forced to do so.

Attempts to prove only create a counter-reaction from corrupters. They assume something invalid is occurring when they see proof. That's because their perpetual rationalizing shows them that they can turn any reality upside down through fakery. So proof looks to them like someone using fakery in a more concerted way in areas which corrupters are not familiar with; and if they had more familiarity with such subjects, they could disprove the supposed proof.

Superficial realities do not have definitive meaning, which convinces corrupters that realities can have any meaning someone wants them to have. And therefore, there is no definitive proof in any area. The attempts to create proof with unfamiliar realities is viewed as nothing more than weaponization of realities in specialized areas.

Corrupters are disconnected from objective reality; so there is no foundational set of realities that can be used as reference points for correctness in their view. It's like they are floating in space, where all realities are tailored for purposes.

Corrupters need to reshape reality to make corruption virtue and rationality corruption. The artificial reality will always have contradictions within it, because no reality can be unified apart from the objective realities of the universe that define life and solutions to problems. So the fake reality of corrupters is less about giving reality a meaning and more about erasing the rationality aligned upon objective realities that define life and solutions to problems.

Rationality exposes corrupters for the incompetent destroyers that they are. So fighting against rationality is the pre-occupation and losing endeavor of corrupters. Corrupters don't know they cannot arbitrarily synthesize a state of existence apart from rationality aligned upon the objective realities of the universe.