News Home
 
 
      

Home
Detailed Pages
▼▼▼  
 

News Pages  239

 
The Nonscientific Nature Of Greenhouse Gas Assumptions

 
December 3, 2024

The only reason why the subject of greenhouse gases exists is the public reliance upon fake authority as their source of truth. Real scientists explain in terms the public can understand. They have been shoved aside and sometimes out of science, because authority trumps logic in the social domain.

Real scientists will never use authority as a basis for claims, because the whole purpose of science is to use the objective realities of the universe as the basis for claims. Five hundred years ago, it was the fraud of authority imposing falsehoods onto society that drove critics to create science as a method of correcting errors.

That means looking to your favorite authority on science will guarantee you being wrong on the subject. Who has been explaining the objective realities to society? Maybe it was Al Gore's total incompetence on science that made him a safe authority on greenhouse gases.

A model can never be explained in science, simply because a model is diabolically opposed to everything in science. Yet the fakes use nothing but modeling to determine the science of greenhouse gas and social propaganda on the subject.

Similar to modeling is statistical studies. They are so diabolically opposed to everything in science that they can never produce a representation of science. The reasons why include too many arbitraries and unknowns in statistical processes but are primarily due to a total disconnect from science in using numbers as substitutes for 500 years of evolved scientific knowledge.

When simple enough, statistics can have a slight accuracy in producing an equivalent to fifth grade arithmetic, but not as a substitute for science. Fifth grade arithmetic would be more accurate than statistical procedures, simply because statistical methods were derived by rationalizers of corruption who wanted more freedom to contrive than arithmetic allowed.

The simplest example is the use of standard deviation as a substitute for average deviation. The difference is that standard deviation is a nonsensical formula which substitutes for the simple formula for the averaging that integrates into mathematics in a consistent and meaningful way. That means standard deviation has no absolute value that can be compared across studies. It might be an extremely small number representing unacceptable deviation in one study and an extremely large number representing almost no relevant deviation in another study.

The reason why a large part of science and related sociology went off the tracks in a major way is that the public acquired a mental block on science. It was always there in the misplaced beliefs of old, many of which continued up to recent times. Evolution is an example.

Religious type persons assumed into the 1950s that evolution was some sort of atheistic scheme. But as science became normalized during the sixties, most religion oriented persons changed their minds and decided that there really is evolution in biology—not all, but most. And guess what? The Catholic pope stated in about 1860, shortly after Darwin's work, that yes evolution exists, but it is under Gods control. Most Catholics didn't know that and rejected evolution into the 1950s.

The mental block that is overwhelming science to a point of destroying energy and transportation systems is the need to latch on to a majority type of consensus for security in determining what truth is. It seems to take more courage than most persons can produce to decide for themselves from clear evidence what truth is.

For that reason, the most fraudulent and disgusting garbage to be produced in science since relativity has become a social belief system orienting around carbon dioxide in the atmosphere killing the kids and pets. The kids have never been exposed to criticism on that subject, and they are going berserk over worry.

Do you think one molecule in 2,500 in the atmosphere can change climate? Can one brick in 2,500 change the temperature of the other 2,499 bricks? Can carbon dioxide in the atmosphere trap heat, while the air temperature can drop 20°C during nights?

IPCC Fraud

How Scientists Are Fired And Intimidated

Other Factors Heat The Planet

Greenhouse Gas Fraud

Renewable Energy Fraud

The March To Fascism

How Power Mongering Works

What Corruption Is      TOP     

     top      

 

Fraud Is Needed To Monger Power
 
Economic Fraud
 
Draining The Economy Dry
 
Greenhouse Gas Fraud
 
Electricity Problem
 
Windmill Efficiency Fraud
 
Radiative Transfer Equations
 
Quotes By Incompetents
 
Other Factors Heat The Planet
 
Consensus Corruption
 
Consensus University
 
Firing Scientists
 
Renewable Energy
 
Electric Vehicles
 
Self-Driving Fraud
 
Artificial Intelligence Fraud
 
Relativity Fraud
 
Peer Review Fraud
 
IPCC Fraud
 

    

 

 
 
 Home Page 
 
 Moral Philosophy 
 
 Political Philosophy 

 
 
 
 Sociology   
 
   News Pages   
 
   Fascism   
 
   Detailed Pages