April 28, 2024

Corrupters believe in their corruption, because it makes them winners. The opposite is rationality, which is alignment upon the objective realities of the universe to solve problems and sustain life.

Rationality doesn't make the persons losers; it makes them separate from and therefore irrelevant to the realities. That means the laws of the universe define the solution to problems, not the subjective whims of persons.

Rationality exposes corrupters for what they are. It shows their incompetence and generates the truth which defeats corrupters. So corrupters fight a war against rationality and pretend that the imposition of subjective force upon everyone is a superior standard, because it makes them winners and being winners is assumed by corrupters to be the purpose in life.

Reagan said, if you need to explain, you are already a loser. Explaining claims is a requirement of rationality. Being a winner in relation to realities and persons is the ruination of man.

There are infinite problems with being a winner over realities and persons. First and foremost, being a winner is a disconnect from objective reality. Nothing constructive can be done disconnected from objective reality. Who says so? The universe says so. The laws of the universe define life and solutions to problems, not incompetent corrupters imposing their ignorance onto everyone.

There is a contradiction between imposing subjectivity and alignment upon objective realities—so much so that corrupters have to pretend to be aligning upon objective realities through rationalizations.

So the difference between rationalizing and producing rationality needs to be clear. Rationality is making relationships between realities, the same as reason. It must be applied to the related, significant realities that determine correct alignment upon the objective realities of the universe that define solutions to problems.

Rationalizations fail all the tests of rationality. That means omission of explanations required to determine relationships between relevant realities aligned upon the objective realities of the laws of the universe.

What rationalizers try to do is connect through proximity realities that don't connect. Mentioning two things in the same sentence is supposed to mean they connect, while they don't connect.

It's an extremely visible and obnoxious pattern of conservatives to attack by accusations with no explanation of how or why the accusations are relevant. Satan is referred to in the Scriptures as "the accuser," because he does that so obnoxiously in his attempts to degrade his enemies.

What conservatives have been showing is their assumption that accusing is all there is to attacking opponents. First, they try to portray applications of law to Trump's criminality as nothing but politics, meaning they don't see a relevance to laws, their meaning and how they are investigated. Then they attack and accuse opponents, as if accusations create facts, as they have been trying to do in impeaching Biden on the basis of nothing but hate for liberals.

In other words, attacking is all corrupters know. Aligning upon objective realities as rationality is supposedly a plot to overthrow human existence. The accusation of "woke" is supposed to say that. The rationalization of the term woke is buried in historical complexities; yet everyone is supposed to redesign government to remove woke from human activity. When the public is asked what woke means, they describe rationality. No one knows or cares what the incongruous historical rationalizations consist of. So the attack upon woke is supposed to tell people to attack rationality.

The net effect is corrupters attempting to make themselves invincible dominators overwhelming everyone else with no realities getting in their way. Any mention of related realities is supposedly woke. Why is attacking woke the magic to success for corrupters? Because they say it is while not allowing objective realities to get in their way.

Corruption is supposed to be a superior state of existence due to invincibility in disconnecting from objective realities. That means imposing destructivity onto everyone. It takes power to impose destructivity; so corrupters are power mongers and rational persons are supposedly losers, except that nothing constructive has ever been accomplished without rationality.

Another extreme example is referring to any mention of Palestinians as "antisemitism." Blocking any discussion of some subjects such as Palestinian concerns with the accusation of antisemitism couldn't be more disconnected from objective reality in the attempt to impose power as force onto everyone. If there is a need for correcting, attacking with a slogan and no evaluation of related realities couldn't be more of a corrupt attack upon rationality.