July 24, 2024

Youngsters seem gloomy. There is a heavy smog overlaying society—a heavy weight on everyone's backs. Everyone gets blamed. Polarization obstructs Congress. Expenses become unmeetable, while fakes say the economy is the best ever.

That's because fraud became a pervasive element of the social order. It's not a dispute that defines fraud; it's a standard and methodology. Being wrong is not the problem. Wrongs are too easy to correct. Nothing's perfect. It's a methodology. The fraud methodology is undisputable yet uncorrected or not even mentioned.

The mentality of the fraud is reflected in incongruous technology being portrayed as some sort of wizardry in machines being humanized in contempt for laws of physics. No one could actually believe that metal is going to do what humans do. Yet frauds project the impression that it does, while people ignore the preposterousness, as if it were unavoidable smog.

That standard is not an accidental part of complex technology. It is obtuse and ridiculous. So why is it happening? Because incompetent power mongers need fraud to prevail over rationality. They need to glamorize their stupidity as wizardry that is over the heads of lesser persons.

The degree of overwhelm prevents most of the fraud from being argued. That means there is no identifiable difference between believing the fraud and knowingly promoting the fraud as fraud. The youngsters seem to be much more inclined to believe the frauds than older persons who have seen the process develop and are aware of the alternatives. That's obviously because the youngsters have been indoctrinated on the frauds long before they had any ability to evaluate the subject matter.

One of the most significant elements of the fraud is its purpose and result in stripping rationality from the social order. Subjects aren't handled the way they used to be. Journalists of old were said to be protectors of truth for society. Now the prevailing influence is know-nothings in journalism and organizations imposing the frauds onto everyone.

The youngsters don't know that carbon dioxide used to be an argumentative subject. Now days to dispute the subject is viewed as an attack upon life. That shows why being overwhelmed by fraud is not how realities are supposed to be handled. Criticism is supposed to be a common part of all evaluation. Now days, criticism is viewed as socially unacceptable.

Frauds set the standard by flipping quips with no explanations, which creates a social process that is repeated so often that no alternative is recognizable or acceptable. Carbon dioxide must be a quip which is acted upon rather than a subject to be discussed and criticized, as if the discussing was all completed and conclusions unquestionable. Do the kids know what that discussion consisted of before they were born?

The kids don't know that there is not a transition after drawing conclusions to put an end to all discussions. They have the fraud standard engrained into their lives, as if it were normal.

The frauds shifted the social standard from discussing every reality to putting an end to discussion and evaluation, as if human sociology went past the ancient concepts of enlightenment and put an end to rational evaluation. Post rationality, it would be called, if it were being discussed intellectually.

"On par with coal" and "carbon free" would normally be fraud statements regardless of what they meant because of the absence of explanations. There isn't a level of truth which puts an end to explanations of claims.

Being missed is not just the proper conclusions but the whole universe of discussing and explaining subjects. It's a reversion to animal sounds replacing human intelligence and being portrayed as mysterious wisdom. Humans are left only to act upon the conclusions rather than evaluate them.

One of the most expensive and overwhelming frauds is labeling offensive militarism as defense. As always, the fraud is in the standards and methods. Destroying civilians and civilian infrastructure is said to be defense, while methodologies do not require destroying civilians and their infrastructure for defensive purposes.

But corrupters have a slogan that says, the best defense is a good offense. Corrupters believe in and act upon their mindless slogans, because they pick slogans that are nothing but rationalizations for their corruptions.

Using force and violence for claimed defense is the same thing as terrorism. Corruption deteriorates into terrorism as the extension of the force and violence corrupters use to dominate as a substitute for the rationality that exposes them as the incompetent corrupters that they are. Domination becomes imperialism, as it transforms into totalitarianism with the purpose of rooting out every vestige of opposition to corruption.