May 20, 2024

The first rule of incompetents is that they don't cross their bridges until they get to them. That means trial-and-error and no ability to predict or evaluate. They haven't crossed the bridges for renewable energy, electric vehicles or self-driving, because they are up against walls of impossibilities. They don't have charging stations, because there is no way to get enough electricity strung along highways. Nothing changes decade after decade, because the frauds have no way of crossing the charging-station bridge.

But they find new bridges to cross and disappear the old ones by re-writing history. The new bridges include going to Mars and producing machines with intelligence. They never will find out that there is no way to get enough energy in spacecraft to go to Mars. But they are on their way to finding out what that bridge looks like.

Then the half-baked results need to be imposed. The first step in imposing is to allow no criticism, because all interactions of realities cause truth to evolve. When realities interact, consistent relationships are strengthened and inconsistent relationships are weakened to increase truth.

Truth is the communicated representation of unified reality. The communication process has to be stopped to prevent truth from existing. Stopping the communication process requires no criticism being allowed. It also requires isolation of opponents, so they cannot criticize and communicate unified realities.

Silencing opposition requires a war against the lower classes, because truth comes from the bottom of society and works upward. To silence the lower classes, they need to be oppressed and uneducated. So the education system needs to be nonfunctional.

Making the education system nonfunctional means run-down schools. But it also means corruption of subject matter. The subject matter is disseminated not just through books but at teachers colleges.

An example is a biology book written for the level of teachers colleges which describes metabolism as "aerobic fermentation" and "anaerobic fermentation." The scientific definition of fermentation is, a final electron acceptor other than oxygen. If it is other than oxygen, how can it be aerobic?

How they derive that logic is to change the meaning of words. The breakdown of glucose is called glycolysis. So the term glycolysis is changed to fermentation, as if this were the sixteenth century when fermentation meant bubbly solutions.

Branching off from glycolysis are two alternatives: respiration and fermentation. So respiration is relabeled aerobic fermentation and actual fermentation is called anaerobic fermentation.

That example shows the motives and standards for reducing education to rubble. We only see the final results. Students in the U.S. seldom go into science now days. They used to. Turning the education system to rubble explains why.

Of course, as always, there are two alternatives created by incompetents: one for themselves and the elites and one for the lower classes. So the resources are being channeled out of the public education system for the lower classes and into elite education for the upper classes.

Does that mean the elite schools teach real science? Not hardly. That would show the contrast. Instead, the elite schools teach word salad and how to rearrange the social order on the basis of word salad.

The way word salad works is to quote and plagiarize. Words are moved around with no meaning. The introduction to word salad is taught at public schools by using Shakespeare. Quoting Shakespeare as the source of wisdom is learning how to use word salad in place of relevance.

Incompetents promote what they produce as the test of worthiness. What they produce is word salad and entertainment. That means science must be reduced to irrelevance, because science requires strict standards of measurement, verification and logic aligned upon five hundred years of evolved scientific knowledge.

In reducing science to irrelevance, know-nothings in journalism and organizations speak for the scientists, since those persons can't be expected to explain nonsense in science. That methodology allows frauds in science to wash their hands of the absurdities while feeding nonsense to the know-nothings who inform the public. No criticism is allowed, while real scientists who try to correct the errors are silenced or shoved out of science.