May 10, 2025

The first step for improving government is to stop trying to improve it as a structure. It is supposed to be an administrative process, not a tool for social control.

The founding documents describe methodologies, not policies, because there is a vast difference between proper methods of doing things and imposition of motives and values as policies which are amorphous, transient, undefinable and misrepresented.

Then a lot of small things need to be improved for administrative processes. First and foremost is to align upon the purposes of the founding documents rather than aligning upon motives and rationalizing them with technicalities that misrepresent the purposes of documents and laws.

Social problems can only be solved by the whole society, not a group that imposes their motives onto everyone else. So the question is, can government get a collapsing social structure redirected properly for solving such monumental problems.

Only truth will diminish corruption, because truth is the only force corrupters cannot defeat. Truth is linkage to the universe which no one can defy. That means improving the ability to produce truth is needed, which does need to include the government.

There is a truism that nothing constructive can come out of the dark, because openness and accountability are needed to increase truth, while corrupters are untouchable where there is the darkness of no openness and accountability.

Congress has produced endless laws to protect whistle blowers to no avail. Anyone who tries to correct errors in the bureaucracies is called a whistle blower and shoved out of the process if not into prison. That's because of the total unaccountability of those elements of government that operate behind closed doors.

There are two types of governmental functions: the routine applications and the decision making processes. The Internal Revenue Service and Social Security Administration go through routines with only minor decisions in making the processes work properly.

Then there are problem-solving bureaucracies such as the Environmental Protection Agency, Food and Drug Administration and many others. They need a lot more openness and accountability to get their decision-making processes aligned properly. Instead, they withdraw farther into darkness to insulate themselves from external influences, as their tasks become more difficult.

The clearest example is assigning the EPA the task of removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, as the courts verified that responsibility in contempt for the objective realities that there is a shortage of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere for plant growth and there is no technology that reduces carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. So energy and transportation systems are destroyed to perpetrate a fraud with nonfunctional technology.

That occurred because of no criticism being allowed on fraudulent science. The bureaucrats followed the fraud; they didn't instigate it; but they did make it intractable with governmental authority.

What should have been done is to require complete openness and accountability on related subjects with critics having a say. Instead, a fraudulent organization was created called the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change made up of political hacks who disallowed real scientists to influence the results. What it shows is the need for openness and accountability which assures criticism on controversial subjects.