November 21, 2024

Glibness means stripping all complexities out of realities. It's a major element of propaganda. It's usually recognized as polarization of issue; but polarization is only one element of the glibness problems.

Normal journalism would certainly have been taught otherwise; but now days, the opposite of glibness—the explanation of complexities of issues—is unusual and glibness is the norm. It makes one wonder what is being taught in journalism now days. Could it be as fraudulent as physics?

The most visible element of glibness in journalism is know-nothings telling us what the science of a subject consists of—not through explanations but in phrases which are usually fractions of a sentence.

Such as contradicting everything Robert Kennedy says with an opposing science position. There is no science that is not complex and surrounded by infinite arguments or frauds. But all we need to know is that the journalists have it all figured out and it is an absolute plus or minus, good or bad.

That raises the complex social question of how glib persons determine what reality is. On a broad, social scale, it is consensus that incompetents use to determine what reality is. But journalists are informing us of something we supposedly don't know. What is their source of reality?

Know-nothing journalism is aligned upon propaganda. In fact, the propaganda is largely designed though journalism. That happens, because power mongers take over the social structures and use journalism for their motives.

Power mongers bought and sold media for about two decades, until they had total control over mainstream media, and then shaped their result as propaganda.

The first requirement of propaganda is not to shape a viewpoint but to erase rationality, because rationality exposes power mongers for the corrupters that they are. Glibness, as know-nothings representing the most complex subjects on planet earth with three word slogans, is how that works, such as "carbon free" and "on par with coal."

Then shaping follows the glibness with endless absurdities, which are mostly nonsequiturs unrelated to the points being made. Nonsequiturs are extremely important in propaganda, because the links must be broken to prevent realities from being developed and exposing the scheme for the fraud that it is.

The nonsequiturs are tangential irrelevancies but spiked with values and implications that promote the existing state and degrade critics. The claims are imposed as inviolable, which is inherent in the absence of explanations, such as the pandemic being cured with vaccines, which supposedly proves that vaccines are flawless products of the immutable perfection of the social structures, which could only be attacked by someone who hates life and can't think straight.

What then is the shaping of the propaganda aligned upon? Power mongering, of course. That means the controlling, vested interests are the answer to everything and opponents, such as Robert Kennedy, are the ruination of man.

Robert Kennedy's purpose is to improve social structures; and he says that his technical expertise is not the point. So when know-nothings attack him as a threat to their existence, they are implying, if not directly claiming, that there is nothing but flawless perfection in what Robert Kennedy is trying to improve.

Robert Kennedy has more than the usual qualifications to evaluate social structures, as he has been involved with endless social structures for decades in correcting environmental frauds and creating an organization for improving children's health. Know-nothings are supposedly more qualified than him in negating everything he says. Negating for mindless reasons is glibness replacing rationality.