May 15, 2024

Arguments now days no longer show a concern for right or wrong. They promote a view of false pragmatism based upon defeating opponents—not simply in Trump's obtuseness but everywhere that power prevails.

Defeating opponents will always defeat the instigators. Not the least reason is because opponents cannot be tailored for purposes. Opponents include a lot of persons with different values on all sides. Then defeating opponents is a process based on destructivity. Destructive persons are incapable of doing anything significantly constructive.

The persons who try to defeat enemies are hung up on the necessity of being winners and assume destructivity is how to be winners. They monger power to get there assuming winners are persons who overwhelm opponents rather than persons who accomplishes something constructive. Getting methodologies that wrong makes them self-destructive.

The reason for concerns for right-from-wrong is to prevent such destructive behavior. Concepts of right-from-wrong take into account the complexities including the abstract basics that determine net results, where power mongers never get past the starting points of quick fixes.

As corrupters fight against enemies and accomplish nothing constructive, they are continually worse off. In trying to be better off through destructive means, they keep getting more and more obtuse in their destructivity.

Yet corrupters rationalize their destructivity as the imagined solutions to everything. They skip from the quick fix of destroying enemies to the wonderland of solutions to all problems.

The persons who are too incompetent to get past the starting points assume they are going to populate the universe with imaginary technology. Rationality is not a part of that process. Rationality says there needs to be a clear description of methodology in place of fakery. Power mongers assume rationality is for fools.

The basis for the fakery is the assumption that reality can be shaped into any result, if enough persons go along with it. Consensus supposedly produces unlimited results. More basically, power is assumed to be the answer to everything; and it must begin with consensus.

But the attempt to produce rationality is disruptive to mongering power, as rationality dissipates consensus in aligning upon objective reality, which makes the persons irrelevant. Rationality disrupts mindless destructivity, not the real solutions to problems. Consensus and power are the real disruptive forces; but corrupters cannot accept that fact, because they have nothing but power mongering to make themselves winners due to their incompetence.

Defeating enemies requires fraud. The public has to be lied to about the purpose, methods and history to create wars. That's not a democratic process; and the need for fraud shows that it's not something the public benefits from. So why something non-beneficial? Because incompetent power mongers need fraud and wars to be winners.