July 3, 2024

Consensus is replacing education in determining what reality is in society. Carbon dioxide is the most extreme and clearest example.

Historically, consensus was the method of determining what reality is, perhaps originating with animalism; and then education allowed increased complexities to be aligned properly upon objective realities resulting in technological progress.

Now, society is reverting back to consensus replacing education due to increasing fascism overwhelming social structures and replacing them with power structures.

The deterioration of education has long been realized, as corrections were attempted through testing, which only made the problems worse. Superficially it might appear that complexities increased faster than education could keep up; but the basics should have stayed the same, as complexities increased.

That means it was the fascism that shifted social standards in the direction of rationalizing and imposing values in conflict with objective realities. In other words, kids were more and more taught how to promote causes and values instead of learning basics. Causes were assumed to be too important to ignore, with misdirected greens and driven conservatives charting the path.

That result shows that consensus is the default position and only education can correct the alignment of realities. But as fascism increases, a reverse assumption says that consensus is too important to allow education to get in the way of promoting causes and values.

Why then is consensus viewed as such great importance? It's because consensus is the power of numbers. Power increases in its importance as social problems increase. Supposedly, it takes power to overwhelm opponents as the method of correcting errors, while a variety of irreconcilable differences develop.

It's important to notice the error of assuming power is the solution to correcting reality differences, because power is the method of falsifying realities and imposing falsehoods.

Consensus is aligned upon authority assumptions as the method of correcting reality errors. So-called fact checking is based on that assumption. Fact checking is the use of authority to replace rationality.

Rationality is alignment upon the objective realities of the universe that define life and solutions to problems. Education is supposed to be a process of improving rationality. But Power mongering is stifled through rationality, because truth is generated through the interactions of realities and exposes corrupters for what they are.

As power mongers acquire more power, they overwhelm rationality more thoroughly, which includes replacing education with promotion of consensus.

Superficially, it appears that conservatives are following the correct path of promoting objective reality in the conflicts over fake science and technology, as some are now opposing the carbon dioxide fraud and so-called renewable energy. But they were handed that virtue on a gold platter by liberals, while conservatives produce no real evaluation of the complexities. In fact, the only legislation that both sides could agree upon was promoting more greenhouse fraud.

Biology has long ago been referred to as "quantitative biology" due to measurements with numbers replacing the old fashion method of interpreting visual observations. As a measure of the state of fascism, the quantitative perspective disappeared in promoting the absurdities of fake science and technology. Looking out the window now replaces quantitative science.

One molecule in 2,500 could not influence the atmosphere if it were a miniature nuclear reaction. The numbers are repelled by the fixers as if they were a disease. There is no concept of quantitative significance, which indicates the deteriorated state of education.

At the top of every state and local web site on carbon dioxide, which would be in the thousands, was the claim that nothing heats the atmosphere but carbon dioxide. Society acquired its assumptions on the dread of carbon dioxide from those web sites with the view that no one but terrorists would be saying otherwise. No criticism was allowed, because the certainty of facts could not be sacrificed to such denialism.

That's consensus based on fraudulent authority replacing everything education was supposed to produce.