October 14, 2024

Conservatives do not use explanations of their claims to align realities upon the objective realities of the universe which define life and solutions to problems. Instead they promote as an argument. They supposedly represent or produce a superior state. The reference is themselves and their results, not the related realities that determine results.

If, for example, having corporations burn tax dollars on stock buy-backs to supposedly improve the economy, there should be some reason why. No reason is given, just them saying so.

There is always a sanctimonious claim used as a justification, while the claims are ridiculous. But everyone has a right to be wrong, as long as they have a more sanctimonious purpose than everyone else.

All of the boats will rise, if the power mongers are allowed to rip everyone off. It didn't happen that way, but nothing is perfect. Having more sanctimonious purposes than anyone else is the only relevance.

Conservatives degrade opponents instead of allowing realities to determine results. Degrading requires overwhelm to prevail. So they acquire the power to overwhelm and use it to impose corruption which does not stand up to evaluation of realities.

Conservatives have the purpose of winning arguments by destroying opponents. Who gains what from that process? It doesn't solve problems, because it doesn't have that purpose. Making incompetent corrupters winners is the purpose. Even if you assume they are the lords of existence, the purpose is not to solve problems in destroying opponents to be winners.

When and how do problems get solved, after conservatives make themselves winners? Do they describe another process for solving problems? Not hardly. Their existence consists of making themselves winners and nothing other than that. Anything other than that would be incompatible with the methodology of destroying opponents, which includes every type of corruption and fraud.

If not, where is the alternative? Rationality is the alternative. It doesn't mix with destroying enemies. It takes corruption of realities to destroy enemies, which destroys the process of producing rationality.

Is there such a thing a destroying realities for awhile and then improving realities for awhile? The realities all get linked together, which means they don't change with purposes.

That means the process of destroying enemies is the process that conservatives use to run the world afterwards. Tariffs might be a part of that process; but improving economies, manufacturing or technology doesn't occur with that process.