March 8, 2025

Corrupters use winning as a test of status and worth. A test is only relevant to corruption; otherwise, actuality doesn't need a test. Testing is rationalizing.

To a large extent, it is winning that creates corruption. The difference between winning and accomplishing is subjectivity replacing objectivity. Winning is for self; constructivity is for everyone.

If something is done for self, what does anyone else gain by it? Are there accidental benefits for others? What is accidental? If others benefit, it would be accomplishing something as constructivity. That is, unless it was a fraud and no one gained anything.

The manner in which corrupters make themselves winners is through domination to prevail against other persons. Force and violence are needed to dominate, because no one can accomplish anything while being dominated by corrupters. For that reason, domination is the basis of all corruption.

But a lot of persons are just thrilled to be on the side of winners. That's because corrupters conspire to acquire power through numbers. They want some of the power to rub off onto themselves.

There is a contradiction in that process. If destructivity creates winners and the winning rubs off onto others, then the result is harm to the persons who want to be part of the process.

In other words, going through the process of winning is a self-destructive process; but corrupters want to be winners to prevail against other persons. They assume they gain something by forcing other persons to submit to their will.

It's the gameboard mentality, where winning is a game rather than a constructive process. The reason why it happens is because corrupters assume they can align activity upon their motives by imposing the result with the corollary that imposing their will solves their problems.

Impositions to solve problems are always the cause of more problems rather than the answer to problems, because the process is diabolically opposed to the methodology required for solving problems and only incompetent corrupters would get that wrong.

Since winning is a fictitious and subjective substitute for accomplishing, the persons who initiate the winning are superior to the persons who go along for the ride—the sycophants. For that reason, corrupters strive to be winners. The more winning they do, they more control they have over other persons, which is status.

Acquiring status is the process of prevailing over other persons. The number of persons who go along determine the amount of power acquired.

So there is a high degree of psychology involved in convincing gullible persons that the ability to be a winner is a sign of superiority and getting them somewhere.

The psychological requirement of convincing results in a lot of symbology and impressions. That's why so-called charismatic leaders, such as Applewhite, use smoke and mirrors to convince followers of their godliness.

At the social level, climbing the social ladder to achieve status is an art-form that changes as the position on the ladder changes. As winners climb the social ladder they have to constantly adapt to the changing demands. They need to learn what other persons at that level have for realities and expectations and how to pretend that they are superior at each level. A persona is required to generate the image that is expected for the surroundings.

Acquiring status as winners is quite distracting in terms of disconnecting from the objective realities of the universe that define life and solutions to problems. The process turns realities into a mess. But no problem, because the quick fix for realities is simply consensus. Whatever large groups of persons assume reality is solves the problem.

That's how consensus as reality gave us fake science and technology which is destroying energy and transportation systems to remove a rare plant nutrient from the atmosphere.