August 30, 2024

Corruption is defined not by a result but a purpose—the purpose of overwhelming opponents to be winners. That purpose puts corrupters in conflict with the universe; and therefore, lies are needed to defeat the universe. No one told corrupters (or convinced them) they are never going to succeed.

With the universe fighting back, the lies of corrupters have to be total, not pansy ansy. That means total as a requirement not a result. To get there, corrupters have to do a lot of rationalizing trying to make their process look more acceptable than it is. They supposedly love the kids and pets more than anyone else and tough love is how to get there. Tough love means everyone must pay a price to have incompetent corrupters run their lives.

The reason why it works is power supposedly being the source or truth, knowledge and virtue. How could those gods have that much power if they weren't the lords or truth, knowledge and virtue? Just because it looks like incompetent trash doesn't mean it is incompetent trash. That's just the image that is needed, because opposition to the process is created by losers. Getting rid of the malcontents will supposedly solve the problems.

But the reality of corruption is subconscious to corrupters. Subconscious means they made decisions eons ago and don't remember doing so. Over time, they rationalized their decisions and convinced no one but themselves that they are the protectors of all that is right.

Sycophants get there by aligning upon consensus as the definition of truth. You say no one is that dumb? Fact checking is the new method of imposing truth onto society based on consensus being the definition of truth.

What that adds up to is propaganda being aligned upon years of degradation of objective reality, not propaganda being the source of degradation of realities. Corrupters pick their versions of realities out of pre-existing concepts. They have no ability to originate the complexities of social realities.

Consensus is a shift in realities toward exploitation purposes by power mongers. It takes a lot of time and effort to shape consensus around purposes. Of course the most visible example is carbon dioxide killing the kids and pets. It took thirty years to get consensus aligned upon that purpose.

What carbon dioxide shows is that it isn't credible arguments that create consensus but power impressing gullible persons that does it. It wasn't scientists explaining that created the carbon dioxide consensus, it was power mongers showing their godliness that moved the lever of consensus. Following the power-generated consensus is a train of know-nothings who impose the results onto deniers with no criticism being allowed.

Getting back to the starting point, carbon dioxide doesn't have to have any particular characteristics to solve the problems of corrupters; it just has to be something other than what the laws of the universe say it is.