October 23, 2024

As incompetent power mongers took over the social structures and converted them into power structures for their personal gain at everyone else's expense, they transformed journalism into rationalization of corruption, otherwise known as propaganda.

Journalism is highly variable, because it cuts a narrow slice of reality. It must always be superficial, because the public doesn't understand or tolerate abstract realities. Superficial realities are not definable in themselves; they need a context to give them meaning; and therefore the alternatives are unlimited.

Proper journalists were purpose oriented. They would paint a picture through time and place of events by alignment upon a telling result. Not so, now days. The pieces no longer fit together in a pattern that shows a purpose.

Instead, now days an obtuse purpose is rationalized with nonsequiturs. The standard became obtuse because of the conspirators who took over the process, though a defiant few journalists give us more meaningful information in a background which is invisible to: A, the youngsters who are being kept ignorant through social media; B, the politicians who don't have time to scavenge through alternative media and C, the general public which requires an overwhelming consensus to determine their realities.

The problem would be solved with basic, abstract realities which align superficial realities and cannot be falsified due to the line-up of dependent realities. That's what philosophy is.

Philosophy is more provable than science, when properly produced, because the evidence is in social examples rather than incongruous instruments which can be misinterpreted. That's why corrupters re-write history—so the social examples don't prove them wrong.

In addition to stripping journalism of coherence, the conspirators put know-nothings in control of the process for several reasons. First, it is impossible for know-nothings to add rationality to a subject, so there is no danger of rationality being promoted. Second, know-nothings allow conspirators to hide in the background and keep their hands clean, while perversion is being promoted. Third, know-nothings can represent the state of society as a method of portraying degeneracy as being normal.

The constant in journalism is that superficial realities can have any imaginable meaning; so any imaginable or corrupt premise can be stated with no contradictions in the irrelevancies that explain it. Then impressions and inuendo replace explanations.

The most common example is to list a rational, constructive person attempting to solve problems with a degenerate destroying ordered existence and placing an "and" between the two implying that they are equivalents. False equivalencies, critics call it.

The proof is in the fascistic frauds that overwhelmed society in the science and technology area. The frauds are supposedly facts, because consensus says so. The journalists conveyed them as an unquestionable consensus by not allowing criticism of their trash-head claims.