September 21, 2024

The methodology defines the difference between right and wrong. The correct methodology moves toward constructivity; and the incorrect methodology creates corruption.

In fact, corrupters assume any methodology will do, no matter how obnoxious or illegal, as long as they end up in the right place. And of course, the right place where corrupters end up is being power mongering bigots dominating to prevail.

It's more than easy to define the right methodology, which means it's strange that corrupters are not usually held accountable for the destructive methodology.

The constructive methodology is to explain claims. When claims are explained, corruption cannot exist, because visible realities interact with surrounding realities showing correct or incorrect relationships between realities.

So corruption must be concealed while expecting wizardry to come out of a dark pit. Darkness allows corrupters to make preposterous claims and pretend infallibility while degrading opponents with no basis in reality.

Corrupters attack opponents for doing what they themselves do as a defensive mechanism trying to pretend that someone else has that problem more than they do, which is what psychologists call projection—attempting to project wrongs onto someone else. Not the least reason why corrupters do that is because they don't know a thing about anyone else; they only know their own self-evident corruption.

As always, corrupters have a mindless slogan which supposedly proves corruption to be virtue. They say, the best defense is a good offense. So they get offensive to protect themselves from opponents.

Explaining claims creates rationality. Rationality is alignment of realities upon the objective realities of the universe that define life and solutions to problems. The demands of rationality expose corrupters as the incompetents that they are; and rationality generates truth as the only force corrupters cannot defeat.

So of course corrupters hate rationality and fight a war against rationality; and the essence of corruption is to generate a method of being winners in defiance of rationality, which requires domination to prevail against other persons. Domination is the basis of all corruption, because nothing constructive can be accomplished while being dominated by corrupters.

Why then is the extremely obvious methodology of corrupters not the first concern in any concern? Persons who align with corrupters, which is conspiracy, pretend that the degeneracy of corrupt methodology is normalcy. That's a glaring misrepresentation. It shows who is promoting corruption.

It has been such a common part of recent journalism to portray corruption as normalcy that critics have a developed analysis of the aberrant standard. They call it stenography in reporting corrupt claims while ignoring the corruptness and false equivalency in putting corrupters on an equal basis with rational persons.

How much of an explanation is "carbon free" and "on par with coal"? It's all we get from know-nothings who shove real scientists out of the process and call them deniers while allowing no criticism of their claims.