November 20, 2024

Misrepresentation gets more and more extreme, as the social order deteriorates and positiveness is needed for social control. Looking past the political controversies, the internet shows the rapidly changing standard. The Internet has deteriorated into nonfunctionality in the attempts to railroad fraud onto the public.

A large array of mechanisms are used to railroad subject matter in searching the internet. First, no older material can be accessed. A few years ago, the method was to not allow more than about 200 items to be search before cutting of a search and then filling those 200 items with garbage. More recently, the tactic is to change the word or subject being searched to recent propaganda; so nothing else can be searched.

But that's only the beginning. The propaganda that then enters the process is designed for desired results in contempt for existing realities. With fake renewable energy the mockeries of math and science jump out as stark fraud.

The pattern for renewables is to draw positive conclusions, while the world is being bankrupt and energy and transportation systems are being destroyed in attempting to channel trillions of dollars worth of resources into nonfunctional garbage.

Windmill efficiency is a highly developed example, as the propagandists rationalize wanton waste. They claim the larger a windmill, the better. The opposite is true for a lot of reasons. Fifty years ago, researchers determined, the larger the windmill, the less efficient. Part of the reason is because the metals become like rubber when large requiring greater expense. But even more relevant is that revolutions must get slower with larger diameters due to tip speeds being intolerable in generating vibration and noise. Slower revolutions greatly reduce efficiency due to less ability to capture wind energy.

The point here is not to prove the engineering but the method of communication. It would be disgraceful propaganda in normal times but is become common now days.

There are many elements to propaganda. One is nonsequiturs—making points that are not relevant to the claims. A physics equation for blade efficiency will be used to imply an overall efficiency, when it disappears in numerous more important factors.

Several years ago, engineers said windmills were averaging 20% of their nameplate rating due to low wind velocities. In fact, there is a necessity for that low percent, so high wind velocities don't destroy the machinery. But the propaganda now days states all sorts of fake numbers to point toward higher percent and efficiency, while the increasing size reduces the effectiveness and efficiency of windmills.

The propagandists are trying to claim that large windmills are better than small ones in contempt for all facts involved, because windmills keep getting larger. But the only reason for windmills getting larger is because alternatives are disappearing in terms of space and environments. In other words, coping with space and environment problems makes windmills less efficient, while propagandists produce fakery to sell the process as increased efficiency.

Off-shore windmills cost several times more than land-based windmills for obvious reasons. A lot more steel and concrete are needed; and difficult construction environments exist. But propagandists promote off-shore because of inadequate conditions and space for land-based windmills. Running into problems on land doesn't make off-shore more practical; but it is promoted because of the absence of alternatives.

How could anyone miss the fact that producing the huge amount of steel and concrete required for windmills puts a lot of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and claim the result to be "carbon free"? No one mentions it. Real scientists used to; but they are silenced.

How could anyone miss the fact that the cost of electricity increases by a factor of ten when 15% of electricity is produce through so-called renewables, while renewables are said to be "on par with coal"?

How could anyone miss the fact that renewables are up against a wall while not yet at the starting point of replacing fossil fuel based energy? The whole world would need to be transformed to get the claimed result, not just the U.S., while there is six times as much energy used from fossil fuels as from electricity in the U.S.

Preventing any criticism of such extreme frauds, while trying to sell the result with propaganda, requires more lying than any time in history due to the social and technological complexities.

Why would anyone want to do that much lying? How could all those power mongers be wrong? The lies were needed to put incompetent power mongers in control of the social structures.