![]() |
April 30, 2024 "The Ethic Of Power" is the wrong way to produce a title. It's too open ended and non-specific. It's like saying, here's the ocean. But that's how the ethic of power works; so it's an appropriate representation. Everything about the ethic of power is a destructive mockery imposed with no concern for consequences. It never gets described as such, being overwhelmingly abstract, lied about, concealed, rationalized and mockingly idealized. The invincibility of power was impenetrable in the past due to rudimentary sociology. But this isn't the past. (It's appropriate to drench this subject in mockeries, because power is a blizzard of mockeries.) All we have been hearing about Trump from conservatives over the past several months is that he is being politically persecuted. Who is politically persecuting him? The immigrants, Arabs, blacks, the homeless, communists? No, it's the liberals, which means sympathizers of immigrants, Arabs, blacks, the homeless and communists. The primary ethic of power is to do to anyone anything they are vulnerable to. There is no law involved. As if law poisons the blood of the country. Wouldn't the blood of the country be poisoned, if the liberals found laws to apply to Trump's persecution? Or is that the problem—liberals finding laws to apply to Trump's Nazism? The original Nazis in Germany couldn't be taken to court until their country was bombed out of existence. This time, they can be taken to court before the country is bombed out of existence. Do to vulnerable persons anything they are vulnerable to, is the ethic of power mongers. That ethic grows slowly in any society, because it must overwhelm the rationality that creates a society. So how do the power mongers who overwhelmed rationality get persecuted by a society that they overwhelmed? That question is being fought over in the media, politics and courts, because rational persons have more to work with this time than they had last time. But accomplishing anything under fascist conditions transforming into Nazism is quite limited.
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||