October 17, 2024

Frauds never explain, because explanations would expose their frauds and they don't have the abstract knowledge that would be needed for understanding and explaining a subject, which is why they promote fraud—it's a method of acquiring power. Just trust us, is their substitute for explaining. Fake authority supposedly needs no explaining, as the IPCC shows.

Fraud is misrepresentation. It is not defined by results, errors or ignorance; it's defined by the method of getting there. That's because promoters of fraud reduce methods to irrationality to prevent opponents from correcting their results.

The most visible element of frauds is the communication standard. It is nothing resembling proper communication. Why aren't frauds held accountable for their perverse communication standards? It approximately never happens. Apparently because sloppy communication is so common that no one tries to sort out the complexities.

But even then, fraud communication is vastly different from sloppy communication. Fraud communication is rigidly aligned upon a purpose. There is little room for variations. The task is to pretend to be producing some truth while totally misrepresenting the essence.

Promotion of fraud is largely dependent upon fake authority. Then authority supposedly erases the need for normal logic and rationality. Authorities are supposedly such superior persons that they can't relate to lesser persons and we just need to trust them.

One of the main frauds of trash communication is that real authorities and experts can describe their points in clear terms to everyone else; and they have no reason not to. The attempts to hide behind obfuscation is a definitive criterion for frauds.

After trash consensus is developed, authority figures are not used in a visible way; and they hide in the background to allow absurdities to be promoted while washing their hands of the result. Know-nothings are used at that point. The know-nothings do not allow criticism under the pretense that someone else has it all accounted for and all they do is represent some infallible source. Arguing with them is impossible, because they know nothing about the garbage that they impose onto everyone.

That's why fake technology has been reduced to "on par with coal" and "carbon free." The fakes can barely spell coal and carbon; but they don't have to, because someone else has it all figured out and there is no way to determine who they are. That standard is only possible after all opposition has been destroyed in imposing a fraud consensus onto everyone.

There is a secondary element to fraud. It is the process of conveying fraud that has some other origin, where the person promoting the fraud has no accountability and no ability to explain the fraud. An example is know-nothings who speak for scientists in imposing fake science and technology onto science and do not allow criticism of the frauds.

Speaking for sources while having no knowledge is fraud by default. Even if the sources were true, the know-nothings cannot properly represent the truth and will always make false statements not knowing how to properly represent the subject.

Openness and accountability are essential elements of getting complex realities properly represented as truth. Know-nothings have no ability to produce openness and accountability without knowing what the subject matter consists of.

That means using know-nothings as conveyers of information is a method of immunizing fraud from accountability.