Why There Is No Such Thing As A Greenhouse Gas

There is not the slightest possibility of one molecule in 2,500 influencing the atmosphere no matter what its temperature is or what it does.

About five molecules will re-emit absorbed energy of one molecule in 83 femtoseconds and leave the other 2,495 surrounding molecules unaffected.

Radiation absorbed by carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is re-emitted instantly, as all matter emits radiation constantly.

Trapping heat in the atmosphere is an obvious fraud, as the air can cool 20°C during nights.

Incompetents in physics assumed a greenhouse effect, because carbon dioxide in pure form produces heat from radiation in a test tube in a laboratory. They didn't know how to evaluate what carbon dioxide does in the atmosphere.

Carbon dioxide only absorbs long wave, infrared radiation, which is emitted by cold substances such as the surface of the Earth. Cold substances emit almost no radiation for carbon dioxide to absorb. So all of the radiation gets absorbed in a short distance of travel, so more carbon dioxide cannot absorb more radiation.

Real scientists determined that fact more than a century ago. They called it saturation. But incompetents in physics ignored them and promoted nothing but rationalizations for their corrupt assumptions.

Physicists then contrived fake mathematics called radiative transfer equations to show a desired result of 1°C temperature increase for each doubling of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

Other factors heat the planet. Climate is always changing; and it is never due to greenhouse gases. Solar intensity has been increasing, as it does every few centuries. Other Factors

All biology is on the verge of becoming extinct due to a shortage of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere which is needed for photosynthesis, because oceans absorb carbon dioxide and tie it up as limestone and calcium carbonate. Volcanoes restored the CO2 during dinosaur years; but they died down due to tectonic plates becoming too thick for lava to get to the surface.

What this website is about is the methodology of science, not the opinions of scientists. All real science is a methodology, not an opinion. A significant methodology of science is mathematics. So the starting point of this criticism is simple and unquestionable mathematics which proves errors in physics.

Science errors are not possible where the five hundred years of evolved scientific knowledge is applied to the subject. The errors are promoted through glib impositions and obfuscations which defy scientific knowledge.

The errors began with the misdefinition of kinetic energy in Joule's measurement of 1845. There hasn't been an iota of correct physics produced since then.

Joule stirred water in a wooden bucket for an hour or two (not stated) and supposedly measured the temperature increase. He didn't have the slightest ability to conduct such an experiment, as the slight amount of heat produced would have disappeared into the environment as fast as it was produced. Then there were no correct theoretical concepts for his purpose.

So-called renewables as solar and wind power put more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere than fossil fuel-based energy sources. That's because ungodly amounts of metals are required to produce and transmit the electricity over long distances, while 70-90% of the energy in electricity is lost to heat before it is used for a purpose; and another 60-75% is usually lost in being applied to a purpose.

Physics Summary

Biology Summary

These are the major examples of physics errors described here:

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is not science. It is designed by politicians for political purposes with the result being dictated by politicians. The few scientists involved do no more than contrive scientific legitimacy where there is none. Any real scientists who get involved either quit in disgust or are kicked out for criticizing the process. How Scientists Are Fired And Intimidated

Renewable Energy Is Absurd

So-called renewable energy hit walls of impossibilities before getting started. Batteries are never going to improve because of the massive size, which cannot be reduced, because linearized electrons must be surrounded by heavy nuclei which they normally orbit but disconnect from when linearized. Only outer electrons of heavy metals can be linearized for conducting electricity.

Transmission lines cannot be produced for the same reason. Massive amounts of metal are required. There would need to be about 6,000 times as many transmission lines, while they can't be increased by a few percent due to the extreme expense.

Then stringing the energy along highways is even more absurd, because the voltage needs to be reduced from two million volts to some low voltage for batteries. Reducing voltage by a factor of a thousand requires a thousand times as much metal in the wires.

More basically, demanding engineering has become nonfunctional, because engineers can no longer do hands-on work, while real scientists and engineers have been shoved out of the process for trying to correct errors. The incompetents keep trying to produce absurd solutions, because someone pays them to promote fantasy technology.

Gary Novak Evolution Physiologist Liberal Progressive	About The Author Graduate Research Moral Philosophy
	Page Links ►►  g435@nov79.com   TOP