August 15, 2023

What makes Trump's followers so sure he is on their side? The basic standards can't be missed. Basic standards are the most visible characteristics of corrupters. Fakes can never produce the same basic standards as corrupters.

A highly visible element of the basic standards of corrupters is they operate by erroneous assumptions rather than definable realities. Assumptions and objective realities come from different sources. Erroneous assumptions come out of a history of ignorance that should have been much more improved over time.

Even if everyone has assumptions, normal persons don't reveal, let alone impose, their assumptions without enough reality and evidence for other persons to recognize as realistic. Normal people want to be realistic. The unreal assumptions of corrupters don't look realistic.

Since people want to put their best foot forward, the unrealistic assumptions of corrupters represent the corrupt state of their realities. That means they have a long history of being corrupters.

Unrealistic assumptions mean there is no visible context to clarify statements. Absurdities come out of nowhere, such as an election being stolen, while no one can find the slightest evidence no matter how many attempts are made to find such evidence. The complete absence of evidence disconnects such claims from existing realities.

But the imagery of corrupters is not just being wrong; it is methodology that does not attempt to clarify. It takes some effort to clarify. Corrupters skip over the requirements. They simply state absurdities out of nowhere, which generally involves changing subjects in the process.

In other words, corrupters are all over the map with absurdities, which doesn't meet normal standards of communication. Often the purpose is to attack, impose or claim absurdities. Normal persons have more constructive purposes than that; and constructivity requires some explanations of surrounding realities, which is rationality.

Rationality is relating to surrounding realities, which shows correctness, so people can decide for themselves. Without rationality, claims are imposed with no ability to evaluate them.

So, of course, corrupters hate rationality. Since explaining claims is much more acceptable to other persons than imposing absurdities, corrupters assume they are being dealt with unfairly in not accepting their absurdities the way rationality is accepted.

At this time, conservatives are creating absurd disputes over whether they are being dealt with unfairly, when investigations show their criminality. They can't understand that laws have purposes beyond beating someone up.

The problem of basic standards is just as absurd for power mongers conspiring to impose fake science and technology. Power mongers need fraud for prevailing, which requires similar communication standards to those of conservatives rationalizing criminality.

Fake science and technology are imposed with quips devoid of explanations. The quips supposedly represent science; but science cannot be properly represented with detailed verbal communication, let alone quips by nonscientists.

Written communication is needed to properly represent science due to the extremely detailed and obscure points. The main reason is that stable representations are needed that are the same for everyone and always available with the most complete exactness. Verbal communication is not exact enough or stable enough.

Another reason is that the meaning of basic realities is determined by surrounding realities, which get complex in producing new knowledge. Properly explaining the complexities requires stable realities that can be studied without disappearing into nowhere, as verbal communication does.

Because of these demanding requirements for proper scientific communication, frauds easily flush the truth down the drain and prevent criticism of their frauds. Destroying is a bliss, where scientific complexities are difficult to produce.

The corruptions are frauds rather than errors, because the methodology cannot produce correct science. Nonscientists claim to have scientists on their side; but nonscientists cannot properly represent real scientists through any method of communication.

It's strange how whimsical science is generally assumed to be, as if looking out the window proves something about science. Impossibilities cannot be the cause of something. There has to be such a thing as a greenhouse gas, before it can cause climate disasters. The extremeness of the disasters is not a proof of the cause.

It's because of the perverse standards of communication that incompetent power mongers were allowed to hijack science and promote fraud. Proper communication based on rationality with explanation of claims would have prevented the frauds from prevailing.