May 19, 2021

Conservatives rationalize their corruptness in terms of fighting a war. Corruptions are virtues when fighting a war. Lies are weapons in a war. The more destructive, the more effective.

Life is not supposed to be a war. No one is fighting back. It's a one-sided war against invisible enemies.

What conservatives are fighting against is the universe. They put themselves in conflict with the universe through corruption and can't stand the result. They want corruption to be the answer to everything, and when it is not, they assume something unfair is going on. So they fight against the assumed unfairness. It's a self-righteous war because of the assumption that they are trying to correct fairness.

To understand that bit of absurdity, it's necessary to pick apart the process that produces it. The starting point is an attempt to compete or reaction against opposing forces while not using valid or justifiable means of doing so. There is infinite complexity to that starting point.

At the starting point, conservatives are incapable of producing validity in actions, words, assumptions, realities, etc. The nonvalidity creates their problems. What then is validity?

The universe determines what normalcy is, and validity is an element of normalcy. This result is possible, because the laws of the universe shape the requirements for life. To defy the requirements for life is nonvalidity. Everyone must live within the requirements for life created by the universe or the consequence is an increase in problems.

Corruption is a defiance of the requirements for sustaining life created by the laws of the universe. So the next step is to evaluate how and why corruption is corruption in defying the requirements for life.

There are two major problems in the way corrupters relate to other persons or life in general. One is a misrepresentation of realities and the other is the use of force. Force by definition is a conflict with realities, but it involves impositions instead of mere words.

Corrupters would produce that effect by accident, if not deliberately, due to their undeveloped and conflicting realities. In other words, they are incompetent and stupid. So most of the time, they are producing conflicts deliberately. It can be deliberate for several reasons. Often, being deliberately corrupt is accepting the inevitability of being corrupt and adding purpose to it as a method of being a winner. If it is accidental, they are losers; if it is deliberate, they are winners.

Another reason for the invalid impositions is to defeat opponents. There should be few opponents in life, and they should be easy to deal with. Not so for corrupters. They create opponents in everyone else, and opponents are not easy to deal with, because the impositions of corrupters are intolerable.

Corruption grows into intolerability due to the nature of the conflicts. Trying to be winners at something unacceptable requires more intolerable force, while opposition requires prevailing force.

Corrupters don't have the option of changing course and deciding to be nice, because they would be irrelevant losers if they did. They chart a path of not being losers, which requires overwhelming impositions due to their inability to produce constructive standards or methods.

In other words, corruption stems from the decision to be overwhelming with incompetent destructivity rather than finding constructive methods. After following the path of incompetent destructivity, opposing forces require more destructivity and make alternatives impossible to produce.

After that starting point, corrupters adapt to being corrupters by rationalizing and promoting corruption trying to make it acceptable and normal. No one believes their lies but themselves. They convince themselves by repeating their lies over and over.

Corrupters spend a lot of their time trying to make their corruptness look normal and acceptable. They paint over the corruption with opposites. They claim to be doing the opposite of what they are really doing. They claim to be improving everything while they are destroying everything.

To reduce the visibility of corruption while simultaneously reducing the obstacles to promoting corruption, corrupters try to tear down social complexities. Complexities expose their inability to function constructively, even if they try to do nothing. Doing nothing is not credible where there are complexities. So ultra reductionism is part of the process corrupters use for prevailing.

One of the most significant consequences of corruption is that required procedures are not followed. Required procedures expose the incompetence and corruptness of corrupters while creating more opposing forces. So corrupters expect everyone to believe that their fake purposes and virtues come out of nowhere. They supposedly know more about any subject than persons who spend a life-time studying those subjects.

Similarly, there are never explanations for clarifying. Explanations would expose the fraud of corrupters. So everyone is expected to accept everything corrupters say and do on the basis of fraud with no clarifications.