June 6, 2023

Corruption is driven by a motive; constructivity is not. Yet both are often equated as equal in validity or nonvalidity, such as the both sides-ism of journalists.

Equating right and wrong is a major error preventing the wrongs from being corrected. There is in fact an unspoken ethic visible in journalism and elsewhere that says never allow moral implications, as if prejudice would bias information when differentiating between right and wrong.

The "as ifs" are always shaped by corrupters conspiring. They don't need to sit around a big table to conspire, because corruption always has the same basic characteristics resulting in common purposes being aligned with no words being required.

That means there needs to be more truth produced on the characteristics of "the motive" that drives corruption. One of the counter-arguments to moral truth including corruption in science is that surely no one would be that way or do those things, so it isn't happening.

Corrupters are obsessed with their personal problems in the area of incompetence, which causes them to be losers. So they assume, if they could prevail against others, it would solve their problems. Prevailing over persons is domination. It prevents other persons from functioning constructively. And on that basis, domination is the underlying force for all other manifestations of corruption.

Domination requires degradation to gain superiority without constructivity. To gain something from nonconstructivity requires exploitation. To create and victimize vulnerable persons to dominate, degrade and exploit is oppression. So moral philosophers say the basic corruptions are domination, degradation, exploitation and oppression.

Selfishness is the focus of corrupters upon themselves trying to gain something at other persons' expense.

Corrupters set themselves up for jealousy by convincing themselves that they are superior persons. The evidence that shows otherwise sets them on fire. To put out the fire caused by jealousy, they try to destroy the source of the realities. If they were more realistic, the evidence wouldn't create those contradictions.

Where corruption gets most absurd is the war against the lower classes which includes white racism. How could persons that removed be that relevant? It's the addition of all of the forces and results that land corrupters with power upon the lower classes and all vulnerable persons including immigrants.

One of the most significant factors in the war against vulnerable persons is that corrupters cannot handle complexities. Corrupters are ultra-reductionistic in their attempts to simplify realities to a level that they can manage. Name calling has that motive; it simplifies degradation.

The lower classes and vulnerable persons have problems which create demands for solutions resulting in complexities which corrupters are totally incompetent to deal with. That means the lower classes and vulnerable persons create problems for corrupters, whether they know it or not. In other words, corrupters need a blissful existence to be winners with incompetence, while persons with problems erase that blissfulness.

Another reason why corrupters cannot tolerate the existence of the lower classes and vulnerable persons is because corrupters assume they are what they associate with and they don't want persons with problems making themselves losers by associating with them. In other words, corrupters don't stand on their own worth; so they try to extract worth from their surroundings. It's why Trump surrounds himself with gold paint; he assumes it makes him worth gold.

So the motive of motives is the need to dominate as a method of becoming winners by persons who cannot stand to be losers due to their incompetence and corruptness.

Reagan said, if you need to explain, you are already a loser. It shows that he assumed everyone is trying to be a winner and destroying rationality is how to get there. One of the primary requirements of rationality is to explain claims, which corrupters never do, because the resulting truth contradicts their false claims.

Those corruptions show a lot of difference between right and wrong. To equate the two is the equivalent of equating the victims of crime with the perpetrators of crime. Promoting crime would be the result.

"The motive" is the underlying force that drives all corruption, which is the determination to dominate. That motive shows up wherever corruption is occurring. It can't be missed, which means equating right and wrong doesn't look right.

The motive to dominate is highly visible in all corruption including the decadent journalism that imposes fake science and technology onto society. Imposing replaces rationality. No criticism is allowed in promoting greenhouse gases, renewable energy, electric vehicles or self-driving.

"On par with coal" replaces the criticism and evaluation that is needed to prevent the destructiveness of so-called renewable energy. Attributing everything that happens to carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is the new normal. Lack of credibility is no longer a concern, since the frauds have not encountered opposition in ten years.

The imposing force is highly visible. Imposition is ultra-simplistic and includes no explanation. Imposition and lack of credibility are not concealed when incompetent corrupters are imposing fraud with no opposition allowed. The Nazis never had it so good.