Moral Philosophy
 
 
     

Home
Moral Philosophy
Science Errors  
 
 
 
95   ▼▼▼
 

Zero-Sum Vs. Progressiveness
 

Progressives promote the science and engineering required for making progress. That means meeting the demanding standards of increasing complexities. Greens and know-nothing journalists are the opposite in imposing fake science and technology onto society at the expense of the lower classes.

September 5, 2020

Bigotry and racism have a so-called zero-sum mentality. Zero-sum means one person's gain is another person's loss.

It isn't that bigot/racists assume no forward progress is possible; it's that they assume forward progress is the ruination of man. They assume resources will get used up and clutter will accumulate, if humans don't stop producing.

The opposite always proves to be true for reasons that are quite obvious to progressives. The reason is because bigot/racists are destroyers. They would misuse the lass ounce of clay.

So the counter-argument is in the nature of constructivity. To use everything constructively is to never run out of anything or pollute the environment doing so.

This gets to the graph analysis. Persons who can't count past ten use graphs to predict the future. During the 1960s, the graph for population was going up faster than the graph for food production, which told them that everyone was going to starve to death by 1980. Seems the graphs were wrong.

But isn't it logical that more and more or anything is eventually going to be too much? That assumption is missing way too much reality. That's like building a bird house and saying, if we keep buying more and more wood and pounding more and more nails, there won't be enough space in all the world for the bird houses. What they miss is that rationality produces what's needed instead of too much. The idiots have never done enough that is constructive to know how the process works.

Planet Earth could sustain 50 billion people easier than it is sustaining seven or eight billion, if resources were developed instead of squandered. It's that type of challenge than lights off bigots and racists. They say, see, I told you so; they want us crawling all over each other. No; 50 billion is the potential, not the goal. Now use that potential for ten billion people, and they get lost in the vacant spaces. Isn't (wasn't) New York the most desirable place to live on planet Earth (before the stock brokers left and took the gold with them)?

West of the Mississippi River in the U.S., there is more empty space than anyone is ever going to use. It's not a question of space. Much of that space could be used to feed everyone on planet Earth organic food including an unlimited amount of organic beef at half the cost of beef produced now days. I spent most of my life on a farm in the cow capital of the world and started college studying agriculture. The lesson of agriculture is that it doesn't have to be done the way it is being done. It's the economic power structure that grew out of monoculture corn and soybeans that shaped the result in defiance of human necessities.

 
The March To Fascism

Where Fake Science Came From

Draining The Economy Dry

Corruption Is An Ethic

How Power Mongering Works

What Corruption Is

 
  Moral Philosophy      TOP     

    top  

 

Home Page
Political Philosophy
The Sociology Of Corruption
News Pages
Science Errors
    Home Page    
    Political Philosophy    
    Sociology    
    News Pages    
    Science Errors