September 13, 2020

There is not a real logic to the claims of corrupters, because they are obsessed at being winners. To be winners while incompetent corrupters requires a war against reality. The conflict with reality is not just a little bit, when corrupters make themselves winners; an inversion of reality is required.

Of course, none of it can be admitted. Winners wouldn't be winners if it were known that they were incompetent corrupters incapable of doing anything in a normal and constructive manner. So the opposite impressions must be imposed.

This is why corrupters speak in opposites. The image that they need is always the opposite of the truth—so much so that all reality must be inverted as a rationalization. One and one cannot be allowed to equal two, because the truth would be working against them.

For this reason, it is disgusting to see incompetent corrupters being given the benefit of the doubt most of the time. They don't represent anything proper and correct any of the time. Their state of existence is in conflict with the requirements for life.

Being objective, as humans must be, is not looking at the subjective factors of life, which means incompetent corrupters must be dealt with in the same way as everyone else. But that requirement is not the same thing as giving them the benefit of the doubt. It means relating to the realities that corrupters produce as corruptions instead of pretending that they might have some hidden value. There is no unseen value to the realities that flow from corrupters.

In fact, corrupters are always pretending that the value of what they do is unseen, because everything about them that is visible condemns them. They are forever claiming that we must ignore the visible contradictions and absurdities which they produce, because there is a hidden magic that turns corruption into something of value.

The hidden magic of corruption is imposed onto society as a form of gnosticism. It means knowledge that comes out of nowhere. There is no such thing. Knowledge isn't knowledge if it isn't visible and definable. The claim of hidden value is a fraud upon society.

Similarly, corrupters insist that we just trust them. Supposedly, they know how to solve problems in ways that can't be explained. There is no such thing. If they can't explain it, they can't accomplish it.

Yet corrupters promote an ethic of concealment as hidden worth that must not be exposed to the light of truth. Supposedly, everything of value must be protected from the evil of exposure, sort of like clothes covering nakedness. It's total fraud.

To promote the ethic of concealment, corrupters cannot explain what they are trying to promote. So they promote their wares through example rather than explanations. People are supposed to learn the patterns by monkey-see-monkey-do rather than evaluation of meaning and evidence.

How do you determine worth, relevance and correctness without visibility? You don't. And that is entirely the purpose—make sure no one can correct the incompetent destructivity of corrupters by keeping it out of the visibility of open evaluation.

The persons who have been thoroughly convinced of the ethic of corrupters assume that persons who do things openly are the enemies who must be defeated. Obviously, this means that all criticism is evidence of the enemies who must be defeated. But not only criticism, every iota of rationality must be defeated to protect corrupters from truth.

When adding up the elements of the ethic of corruption, the result is a bunch of dregs who don't look like anything but dregs (because they can't add and subtract or chew bubblegum and walk at the same time) claiming they are the answer to everything, that everything they do is spotless perfection and that anyone who claims otherwise is a threat to existence who must be exterminated for the good of man.

They are walking evil. Yet we are supposed to keep them in power by worshipping them and promoting their evil. It doesn't take much of an idiot to see through the corruption, but it gets promoted through force and violence by destroying anyone who doesn't like it.

The result of that process is totalitarian fascism. It was imposed onto society incrementally by taking over complex social structures and using them as a source of power for overwhelming rational existence.