There needs to be an explanation of why science has been corrupted. Here's why:

The abstract nature of scientific knowledge is beyond the understanding of incompetents in science. You might think incompetents would avoid the subject. But science is a source of power which cannot be avoided by the persons who are driven to monger power.

Science transforms into religion as the purpose changes to worship of power mongers and the standards shift to dogmatism. Many critics have noticed that global warming is a belief system lacking scientific standards.

Science is easier than usual to corrupt because of its abstract nature and the obscurity created by the complexity. Persons with a low awareness level do not see the difference between proper and improper science. They use science to rationalize their errors instead of correct them.

The corruption of science was socialized by journalists and organizations who brought fake science to the surface and prevented criticism of it. Fake science is promoted by nonscientists who are not capable of accounting for science criticism yet feel a need to glamorize power through fakery.

Criticism of science is disallowed in science and society. The claim is that science is self-correcting and criticism of science is an attack upon a rightful social order.

A truism is that criticism is always constructive and necessary. Opponents of criticism condemn themselves as corrupt and ignorant.

What it means is there are ulterior motives for disallowing criticism of science. The purpose is to replace rationality with exploitable power. Fake reality is needed to monger power.

An example of the result is the promotion of "peer review." Nonscientists and fake scientists use peer review as their test of truth. Peer review does not exist in real science, and there is no test of truth. Truth must evolve; it cannot be arbitrated. Peer review as a test of truth would be like setting up a truth board to screen social media—no less of a criminal activity in science, yet the new normal for science.

Science produces evidence through measurement. Real scientists scrupulously screen anything other than objective measurements from the source of science. Screening means nothing subjective is allowed anywhere near real science. Peer review is a subjective concern with no relationship to science. It's pure sociology. Scientists will use review as a publishing tool, but there is nothing "peer" about anything in science, let alone peers being a source of truth.

The only thing being argued in the media concerning global warming is the agreement of authorities. In fact, no distinction is being made between political authorities and scientific authorities. Basing science on agreement and authority is a power mongering concern, not a scientific concern.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) shows how it works. It is designed by politicians for political purposes with the result being dictated by politicians. A few scientists are sought as participants to contrive a fake scientific legitimacy where there is none. Any real scientists who get involved either quit in disgust or are kicked out for criticizing the process. Any who remain do not have enough respect for real science to be called real scientists.

So the discussions of global warming in the media and peripheral media take up authority as the only concern. The argument is over who has the most authoritative view.

Authority is used as a power mongering tool, which is a subjective process in conflict with the objective requirements of science. Fake science is used for mongering power, while real science is not malleable enough for mongering power. Fraud must replace rationality to monger power. Rationality causes truth to evolve showing the incompetence and corruption of power mongers. Fraud is needed to destroy the rationality.

Power mongers replace rationality with authoritarianism, which allows them to impose fake reality. Fake reality is tailored for creating superiority without independent evaluation allowing truth to evolve against them.

The importance of power to incompetent power mongers creates a subjective and irrational protection of the power structure which is depended upon. Rationality is a threat to that power structure, so power mongers fight a covert war against rationality.

This is where the war against the lower classes comes from. The lower classes need to solve problems, which requires rationality. Rationality connects to the objective reality needed to determine the cause of and solution to problems. In other words, the complaints of persons who have problems forces rationality onto power mongers, which they cannot tolerate. Power mongers require positivism in their attempts to separate themselves from rationality.

Promoting fraud is a test of a person's allegiance to the power structure, much like street gangsters must perpetrate crime to show their allegiance to the gang. Relativity has that purpose in physics. It is such a defiance of laws of nature that it serves as a test of allegiance to the power structure.

Real scientists explain what they did in terms critics can understand. That's not how climatologist and fake scientists operate. They muddle through a subject and pretend that they can turn lead into gold, while no one knows how they did it.

All of physics is in error except Newton's laws. Errors are irrelevant to physicists, because they view knowledge as a replicating process rather than an evaluation process. There is no such thing as error without the evaluation of abstractions which create knowledge. How Power Mongering Works

 
The Social Perspective

There is simple, mathematical proof that the equation representing kinetic energy is in error. To not have corrected the error, even when shown the proof, means the incorrect equation is fraud, not normal scientific error.

Normal scientific error gets explained and evaluated. When simple math does not get explained and evaluated, it shows that fraud is an engrained standard in science.

Actually, the same is true in post-truth journalism. When errors cannot be criticized, the purpose is to promote fraud as an exploitable standard. It's the new normal in promoting corruption.

Why promote deliberate fraud? Incompetent persons must use fraud to acquire power, because truth exposes their incompetence and corruptness. A war against truth is an underlying requirement for corruption.

There are endless, provable errors in science. They get exploited instead of corrected as a means of mongering power by incompetent corrupters.

The mathematical proof of the improper equation for kinetic energy goes back to the model system for defining energy, which was created in 1686 by Gottfried Leibniz. His model shows that force times distance (fs) equals mass times velocity squared (mv²) for a falling object (being accelerated by gravity), while (fs) was shown to be a conserved quantity of motion in the study of pendulums by Christian Huygens.

But questions lingered. Supposedly, James P. Joule settled the argument by stirring water in a wooden bucket in 1845 to determine the amount of heat produced. Everything about his claims were a fraud, but physicists pretend otherwise to this day.

So I took the modern equations for rocket acceleration and showed that when rockets replace gravity, they need twice as much energy as fuel as required with the Leibniz-Joule analysis. The correct analysis uses the proper amount of fuel in the rocket. It shows that force times time (ft) creates the real kinetic energy, and it is proportional to mass times velocity unsquared (mv), which now days is called momentum. Momentum is the real kinetic energy.

This math is simpler than any math used in modern physics. All engineers and professional scientists are capable of applying calculus to this math. Yet no scientist or mathematician will evaluate, criticize or explain the math or resulting error. Not wanting to do so shows that fraud is an inherent standard in modern science. Journalists not wanting to create accountability for the error shows the same standard in modern journalism.

In fact, global warming is a similar fraud that can be proven through numerous means, as Patrick Moore recently stated, while journalists will not allow criticism of the error. Journalists promote fraudulent science on global warming and will not allow corrections in the media. The fraud standard is condemning regardless of details.

How Power Mongering Works

What Corruption Is