October 26, 2021

The word knowledge is about nonexistent in the media, which means there isn't even a value for knowledge let alone a pretense of producing it. Which also means there is an alternative that replaces and shoves out knowledge.

Knowledge screws up the substitute for knowledge. If people depend upon a substitute for knowledge, they have a lot of problems. So knowledge getting in the way of their substitute is creating more problems.

Knowledge creates problems for persons who create substitutes for knowledge, because the substitutes are in conflict with knowledge. If substitutes were not in conflict with knowledge, they wouldn't be substitutes, they would be knowledge. A substitute is always something different than what it replaces.

So is it a good thing or a bad thing to substitute something for knowledge? Nowhere in five thousand years of philosophy has anyone indicated that there should be a substitute for knowledge that would improve anything. Yet the world runs on a substitute for knowledge.

Science shows the nature of the problem. The purpose of science is to extend knowledge into unknown areas. If knowledge were being increased, science would be doing what it is supposed to be doing. Promoting a nonexistent greenhouse effect is not what science does.

The claim of a greenhouse effect in the atmosphere shows the what and how of a substitute replacing knowledge. The greenhouse effect is the big lie needed for orienting fake technology around a purpose. Fake technology is needed to put incompetent corrupters in control of our lives. Destroying energy systems is needed to save mankind from a nonexistent problem. In that cesspool someplace is the substitute for knowledge doing what substitutes for knowledge do.

Substitutes for knowledge make somebodies out of incompetent corrupters. Incompetent corrupters are lords of corruption who need corruption to make them somebodies. The substitute for knowledge does that.

One element of that equation is that fake knowledge provides corrupters with a superiority, where actual knowledge exposes them for the corrupters that they are. It shows that fake knowledge has some demanding characteristics of its own. What are those characteristics required of fake knowledge?

One thing that is noticeable in the greenhouse fakery is the element of saving mankind from a disaster. Without the disaster, the fakes would be ignored.

Fluidity is also highly noticeable. Fluidity means realities flow in any exploitable direction, such as the greenhouse effect creating hot and cold, wet and dry, hurricanes and droughts—any disaster that needs fixing, fake or real.

Another property of fake knowledge is an absence of reality as source. The person is the source. There is no reality basis for the source, as the reality is in the disasters not the source of the fixing. If the disasters exist, the corrupters must know something about fixing disasters.

When adding these properties up for fake knowledge, the essence is in the person rather than in the realities. It is who is doing it that matters, not how it is being done. That result seems to say fake knowledge is a subjective enhancement of persons rather than a set of realities.

This element of fake knowledge is quite visible in the worship of persons who produce the fake knowledge such as Albert Einstein and Max Plank. There are micro champions of greenhouse gases who come and go in a similar manner. The essence of the subject is in the persons rather than identifiable realities.

What then gives those persons the substitute for knowledge? They acquire their position over time. They have to meet tests of adequacy for the purpose. Einstein was a flunky physicists working in a patent office, until power mongers in physics needed a flunky to promote their corruptions as a method of washing their own hands clean. So they dumped a bunch of accumulating corruption onto Einstein as the representative of their cause.

Einstein shows that the source persons must be built up as representatives of the of substitute knowledge. Using persons as source instead of objective realities allows the substitutes for knowledge to acquire total fluidity. Any whim from the source is the operating reality.

Which might indicate that the essence of the substitute for knowledge is whim, while whim must originate from a person rather than from objective reality.