December 2, 2020

Corrupters hate normalcy. As a matter of fact, that attitude is sort of what corruption is—an opposition to normalcy.

The worst thing about normalcy to corrupters is that it is extremely demanding in trying to solve problems. Reducing the demands of human responsibilities is an endless quest of corrupters.

The human state is that way. It creates extreme demands due to problems which humans encounter. Not wanting to deal with those problems is an opposition to normalcy.

What happens to humans if they don't solve their problems? Only normal persons worry about that. A large part of corruption is not getting there. Corrupters never get past the first step of removing obstacles from their path; so they never find out what they would have if they succeeded.

What corrupters want to replace normalcy with is highly varied based upon the peculiarities of their experiences. Whatever they assume they can excel at is what they strive for.

What do corrupters excel at? Mongering power and dominating are their tactics. Advancing those tactics is somewhat routine; but only corrupters know the ins-and-outs of that subject. It has something to do with creating problems for opponents.

Since normalcy is defined by the demands which the universe creates, any substitute is a conflict with the universe. That means creating problems for humans is the result of attacking normalcy.

Yet corrupters assume they are striving for a superior state. They are extremely self-righteous with their destructivity assuming it is the only state that should exist.

How do they get that way? By talking themselves into it. After corrupters rationalize their corruptness, they have realities rearranged. Repeating that process convinces themselves that it must be true.

The more creative type of corrupters are trying to contrive an alternative state. Fake science and technology are that way. They start with something real and modify it for exploitability which does not have the same demands as real science and technology.

The way it works is to round off all of the corners—deliberately so. Make sure nothing is quite right. Then all of the deficiencies based upon the inadequacies of corrupters disappear in the fluidity. If an auto only has three wheels, some of them just need three wheels, not that something is wrong and needs fixing.

The assumption of conservatives is that those types of corrupters are liberals. Relative to conservatives, fake science and technology might look like liberalism. The so-called liberal elites (on the coasts) who were being voted against seem to fit into that category. But liberalism acquired a definitive meaning over several decades; and screwing up science and technology doesn't fit that definition.

Conservatives view fake science and technology as liberalism, because any type of science and technology, good or bad, is liberalism to them. Conservatives can't handle bad and fluid technology. So it seems strange that the solutions to the problems is putting conservatives in power. Going from bad to worse is not a fix for anything.

When liberals were in control of government, before 1981, they were defining liberalism as promoting equal opportunity. Fake science and technology are only opportunities for rip off artists, not the disadvantaged part of society.