February 12, 2021

Conservatives keep saying, under limited circumstances, that it would be immoral for the government to provide assistance to the needy. They add illogical rationalizations, but the morality part can't be a rationalization when it is not viewed the same by normal analysis. Conservatives believe in the morality part.

To assume there would be credibility in such an unusual statement means there is a developed line of logic for their view. Conservatives work hard against opposition to develop that line of logic. That set of concerns is the underlying basis for a cause that conservatives are trying to promote.

That cause was expressed when conservatives took over the world in 1981 making such statements as creating a "new normal." The certainty was in Reagan's summary as "morning in America."

They are talking about the pillars of their faith, the foundations of their belief system. Morality, normal, morning—those are foundational terms.

And where is it focused? Against assistance to the needy. The foundational belief system of conservatives is based on a war against the lower classes.

An analysis doesn't produce that result. It takes psychological conditioning to do that. Through operant conditioning, a chicken can be trained to peck at a spot until it kills itself. Psychological conditioning is that way. It defies all related realities.

Psychological conditioning starts in one place, where it is aligned upon a purpose, and then gets applied to different circumstances where the contextual purpose and meaning is not the same. It carries something from source to different realities for application. It's like cooking up some food in a kitchen and then taking it out to a park for a picnic.

Corruption produces psychological conditioning, because it's purpose is to acquire power. Power is the positive reinforcement for the psychological conditioning of corruption.

To acquire power is to prevail. Prevailing requires domination. Superiority is needed. Victims are needed. Fake rationality is needed including excuses.

So the most incompetent corrupters seek out the most vulnerable persons to make themselves winners. All elements of the process are successful when the victims are vulnerable enough.

Then it must be sanctified; and the most sanctimonious extreme for corruption is to claim it is morality. Repeat the works until it becomes psychologically conditioned pattern; and abracadabra, morality requires destroying the most vulnerable persons.