The world is running on an absence of knowledge. Obviously, there is a motive. It's that the incompetent corrupters who pushed their way into everything have no knowledge. They don't know it. They assume that their irrelevant blather is knowledge.

So the first question is what is knowledge and how does it differ from irrelevant blather. The main difference is that knowledge is abstract, while blather is not. Abstract reality is absent from the minds of corrupters.

What then is abstract reality? It is nonperceivable reality. More importantly, it consists of the links between relevant realities showing how they relate to each other.

Without abstract reality, all realities become a scrambled mess without relationships between each one. The heads of persons without abstract reality are like garbage cans full of collected junk.

Since the collected junk does not have relationships between the components, the patterns are shaped arbitrarily to fit motives. The carbon dioxide issue is the most noticeable example. It has no relationship to objective reality but serves the purpose of structuring power around the motives of incompetents.

As incompetents shoved rational persons out of the social structures, they reduced the education system to nonfunctionality. Corrupters assume that knowledge is a corruption. They assume that stripping the education system of knowledge is an improvement. In other words, it takes knowledge to know what knowledge is.

The two most visible examples of knowledge being stripped from the education system are in the so-called new math (It was new 40 years ago.) and the absence of reading being taught. These examples attempt to replace a learning process with a magic process. You just pick up the subject through undescribed methods. If there were such a thing as knowledge, endless methodology would be required to learn the relationships between one thing and another. Without knowledge, no connections between points exist.

In other words, knowledge is unified reality in the mind which shows how realities are unified in the objective realities of nature which make up and define life. Unified reality is functional reality. It's absence is dissociated reality. Dissociated reality serves no constructive purpose and gets aligned upon motives.

What this situation looks like is an absence of relevance. Endless garbage is promoted without a constructive reason for doing so. Where is the relevance? It doesn't exist. It's like a ship going across the Pacific Ocean with no water under it.

The absence of water under the ship is superficiality without the substance that gives it meaning and reliability. Corrupters have no use for the knowledge that would giver reality meaning. It isn't that they disagree on what knowledge is; it's that they don't fill in the void with anything.

Superficialities can appear to be extremely erudite in covering endless history on a subject. That mode of operation is replication. Replication of realities is the alternative to knowledge. Replication requires no knowledge and adds no evidence of how realities link to each other. In fact, when linkages are made in attempts to frame something, the links are always incorrect in the absence of knowledge. It take abstract reality to get linkages correct.

One of the manifestations of the absence of knowledge is that corrupters have no use for elements of knowledge when exposed to them. They don't just disagree on knowledge, they block it out of their reality system. Since they cannot understand the abstract realities that link objective realities together, knowledge looks like sand to them—that is, disconnected realities without connections. To them, use of knowledge looks like sifting sand.

The contrast is required to understand how corrupt the absence of knowledge is. Corrupters don't see the contrast without knowledge in their heads. The contrast is in how knowledge is developed and used. You study a subject to develop and use knowledge. Study includes evaluation and criticism. So if someone is wrong in their claims, they don't get ignored where knowledge is relevant. Correcting is an inseparable part of using and developing knowledge. But corrupters never get involved in the knowledge process, they just block it out by not allowing any mention of their conflicts with reality.

Again, the carbon dioxide issue is the most visible example of preventing knowledge from entering the subject. No criticism is allowed, because 97 or 99 percent of the scientists agree. The knowledge process requires addressing all errors. There is never a reduction in knowledge in criticism or correction of criticism.

Truth and knowledge increase through all interactions of realities. Even lies interacting with lies increase truth and knowledge. It's automatic. Corrupters cannot prevent truth and knowledge from increasing through all interactions of realities. That is why they try to prevent realities from interacting rather than correcting errors or criticism. The methodology shows an opposition to knowledge regardless of what the realities are considered to be.

The reason why all interactions of realities increase truth and knowledge is because the interactions cause consistent relationships to be strengthened and inconsistent relationships to be weakened. Corrupters don't like that result, and one method of preventing it is to homogenize everything. With homogenization, there are fewer realities interacting. That means differences are hated and suppressed. The reason why corrupters attack people for being different is because the differences cause realities to interact, which increases the truth and knowledge which condemns corrupters.

The Scholasticism Methodology

Scholasticism is how absence of knowledge creates fake knowledge. It's how physics is created without the abstract realities of knowledge.

Scholasticism began with the wood stove. It wasn't quite a stove at that time; it was a compartment for burning wood on the side of a building. The flue gases would be channeled through the building through ducts. At that time, buildings had open doors and windows, because the use of fireplaces for cooking would send heat up the chimney along with smoke, and the air had to be replaced by coming in through the doors and windows. So buildings would get colder instead of warmer due to the fireplace. It wasn't until thin porcelain tiles could be constructed for ducts that flue gases could be used to heat buildings.

Once buildings could be heated, intellectuals got together to hold discussions. They were theologians, and they primarily had theology and Greek logic books available. So they combined theology and Greek logic to make claims. If any criticism could contradict a claim, it was considered to be untrue. When someone would make a claim which no one could contradict, it was assumed to be a law of nature and called "Natural Law."

Physics is produce through the same process as scholasticism. Physicists can't add and subtract; so they link equations together which evolve over time. When a question arises, someone combines a bunch of equations and makes a claim. If criticism shows a contradiction, the result is discarded, and someone else makes the attempt. When no criticism contradicts the claim, it is said to be a law of the universe.

String theory is the most obvious, recent example. Numerous physicists tried to write equations for string theory but were shot down through criticism. Eventually, someone wrote equations which no one could criticize, so the result became a law of the universe.

With that procedure, physicists evaluate everything as a string of equations for single points, which isolates their analysis from surrounding complexities. Nothing exists in the abstract basics of nature without infinite complexities interacting. But physicists cannot write equations for interacting complexities, so they use strings of isolated math to represent their claims.

Not being able to add and subtracts means physicists wouldn't be able to determine that one and one equals two without someone telling them. When the persons doing the telling get it wrong, physicists get it wrong.

An extreme example at this time is that physicists assume electric motors get 96% efficiency. No electrical transformation into kinetic energy can get more than 40% efficiency due to laws of nature. But when false equations are applied to the subject, the result is 96% efficiency. Physicists don't know how crazy the claim is because they are clueless on laws of nature.

Believers In Magic

Power mongers not only view rationality as irrelevant, they assume it gets in the way of magic. One of the purpose in mongering power is to get things done through magic.

What is magic? No one knows, because power mongers are too mud headed to figure it out . But somehow, power produces it. That is, unless rationality gets in the way and screws everything up.

So if magic isn't working, it's because too much rationality is being imposed onto the subject. One of the reasons why power mongers fight a war against the lower classes is because they impose rationality onto others by complaining about problems and demanding answers.

So power mongers fight a war against the lower classes and against rationality, which are the same wars. That's what they mean by communism or socialism. The labels are irrelevant, but communism exists in that area someplace; so it's better to call the problem communism or socialism than a war against rationality. Corruptions are supposed to have positive labels with them, and the opponents are supposed to have negative labels.

Acquiring Meaning

Scholasticism and the physics variation are attempts and failures at deriving meaning from complexities. The basis of those attempts is conspiracy. In other words, incompetents put their heads together to determine the best result they can produce.

Meaning is in the abstract realities that create knowledge. Knowledge is not a conspiracy. The basis of knowledge is in correctness of relationships which is determined through rationality. Rationality is making relationships between realities (reasoning) to determine correctness.

The real process of acquiring meaning through knowledge requires infinite points to be aligned properly. The most important points (basic realities—laws if the universe) are focussed on, while more trivial points are oriented around them. Improving is a continuous process. The scholastic method attempts to reduce the infinity of knowledge to irrelevant trivia.

As a result, incompetent corrupters view knowledge and rationality as garbage. They see nothing in the process or result of giving abstract reality meaning. So they assume rational persons are contriving meaning in an unjustifiable way. The only justifiable way in their view is to determine an average opinion among status seekers. It's analogous to the mafia turning their crime into virtue by averaging the crimes. The average of crime is their law and order.