March 29, 2021

Conservatives stand out as weavers. They weave realities to get to their desired end points. They do that by re-alignment of realities. Each reality must be re-aligned to fit their motives. They can't accept reality in just any old form; if it isn't woven into their values, it defeats them.

This process shows up in their descriptive material. They first make big claims to have new insights on some subject. They spend several paragraphs reviewing history and often do nothing else. The history isn't the point; the point is redescribing each reality in a way which weaves it around their motives. Each opponent must be cast into a negative light; each supporter must be built up, etc. The history or message doesn't have to be relevant; it's the process that allows them to weave a set of values into the material.

Corrupters assume that rational persons do that in their explanations. It isn't what rationality is; but corrupters cannot imagine what rationality is. So they produce a version of description which serves their motives and assume it is a higher standard.

Rationality is making relationships between realities. Even if incorrect, the errors will be visible and correctable, as long as the relationships are made. But weavers don't make relationships; they pin values onto everything in isolation to surrounding realities which would expose their frauds.

Weaving is how corrupters rationalize. It starts with a motive and aligns all realities upon the motive. Every reality can be changed, inverted or reversed to align upon motives. Up can become down and right can become wrong by weaving realities around motives.

What it shows is how motives and purposes override realities in the world of corrupters. Reality isn't reality to corrupters; it's a malleable tool.

To rational persons, the weaving is simply hypocrisy. Apply the same standards to self as to enemies and the hypocrisy ends and realities become the same for everyone.

But corrupters live for the dichotomy between enemies and friends. Their existence is a war against enemies. To deal with everyone equally is to admit defeat and allow their enemies to walk all over them. That is the state of existence that corrupters designed their lives around.

Corrupters cannot tolerate universality, which means everyone being equal. Universality cannot be produced through motives, as there is no such thing as a motive that works equally for everyone. Therefore, universality must be the absence of motives—a state that corrupters can never accept, because corruption by definition is charting a path that puts corrupters above opponents. If not, it isn't corruption.

Getting back to what weaving looks like, it is one of the things that makes corrupters look nonhuman. Humans aren't supposed to be weaving realities. It's a destructive process, even though it hasn't been criminalized. Not all destructivity can be criminalized.

But since corrupters assume weaving is normal—even superior to objective rationality—the process isn't being exposed clearly enough as the corruption that it is. So picking it apart seems necessary.

The example that brings this point to the surface is the modernized Jim Crow laws. They weave a process into place which prevents blacks and low class persons from voting pretending to be totally objective through rationalizations.

It is said that the Georgia law prevents anyone from giving water to someone standing in line, because it might be voter intimidation, but water coolers can be available. Not mentioned is that blacks stand in lines for hours, while whites don't even have lines. A lot of blacks can't get to voting stations which are miles away and very few around them.

What the weavers/corrupters are saying is that liberals giving water will subvert an election, but conservatives putting a water cooler in place will not. Another claim is that anyone can request a mail-in ballot, but no one can help get it to the right place, because vulnerability to crime might increase.

So conservatives are pretending that they have everything designed to spotless perfection in eliminating the intimidating effects of giving water, while they don't notice that most blacks do not have realistic access to voting or the identification cards being required. Rationality includes those facts; weaving realities does not.

Weaving Jim Crow laws into place seems so logical to rationalizers. It's obviously designed to get conservatives elected. Rational persons see something wrong in it; corrupters see spotless virtue. Rationalizing isn't just a fix for corrupters; it supposedly makes them superior persons, as if no one else was brilliant enough to rationalize but themselves.

Part of the problem is that corrupters cannot imagine what objectivity or universality is based on objective reality. Objectivity is an absence of motives influencing realities. Realities can be picked for relevance but the purpose of not being arbitrary is vastly different from the purpose of shaping the result for motives.

Corrupters cannot escape their purpose of shaping existence around their motives. It's the "new normal" and morning in America. It's instituting the brilliance of conservatives in shaping existence around their motives through hook and crook. Only fools would fail to do so, in their analysis.

Certainly, values are visible when being objective; they just aren't allowed to misshape realities. Certainly, arbitrary choices must be made in being objective; they just aren't allowed to misshape realities. Corrupters assume that misshaping realities is the highest standard that can be achieved, because it advances their purposes in life.

In weaving, everything a liberal does will supposedly be designed to corrupt, while everything a conservative does will be perfection. If a liberal offers water, it will be intimidation of voters; If conservatives screw up the Post Office, it will be the only possible method of handling mail.

Of course, a noble purpose is one of the motives for weaving. Loving the kids and pets more than anyone else requires weaving mockeries into existence, such as stripping automation equipment from the Post Office to economize. You would have to hate the kids and pets to prevent DeJoy from instituting austerity in the Post Office.

When liberals are in power, mail gets delivered fast and reliably; when conservatives are in power, everything is slowed down and screwed up. There are predictable reasons. Notice that the purpose given by DeJoy is to save money. That's a values concern. The purpose is not to produce a public service as effectively as possible. So a public service is degraded for saving money. The U.S. can supposed afford to go the Mars but cannot afford to produce reliable mail service. Those concerns are values promoted by conservatives aligned upon winning elections.

Hypocrisy is the definitive difference. No corrupter can avoid hypocrisy. If the standard isn't different for themselves than for enemies, everything they promote is in error. The new normal becomes a vice rather than a virtue; morning in American because darkness and defeat. Favoring self over opponents is the new normal; it's what corrupters design their lives around.

Notice then that corrupters can never produce explanations which are not self-contradictory, because they will never say that they are biased toward themselves or producing inconsistencies. Yet their purpose in life requires bias and inconsistencies as hypocrisy. If not, they don't have the invisible solution to everything that makes them superior to others—like making America great again, getting rid of the rust belt and putting everyone to work on re-industrialization and bringing back the manufacturing—all with no explanation of how, just trust us, because we have the invisible answer to everything. The invisible answer is defeating enemies through criminality and every corruption possible.