January 14, 2021

Corrupters can't understand why they should fight their war with one hand tied behind their back. One of the simple reasons is because life isn't supposed to be a war. Corrupters can't understand that. Their whole lives are a war against enemies and they don't want someone running interference.

It's not a justifiable war that corrupters fight. Therefore, laws are written to prevent the result. The laws are intolerable to corrupters, because the result forces them to fight their war with one hand tied behind their back.

Laws are that way. People learn what causes their problems and what solves their problems. So they use laws as a solution to their problems. Corrupters don't. They want nothing added to the difficulties they have in winning their wars.

That conflict pits the mindlessness of corruption against the ordered existence that rational persons have created. There is not a logic to fighting a war against rational existence. So laws are written to prevent it. Corrupters cannot stand the existence of such laws and fight against them.

It's strange that the mindlessness of corruption increases the determination to prevail. If there were a rational explanation, reason could improve the situation. But there is no starting point for improvement with mindlessness.

Not the least reason why corrupters defy written laws is because they cannot understand them. A law in writing extends from the immediate. Write several of them, and there is a degree of abstract reality that people are supposed to understand and adhere to. That's not the universe that corrupters exist in.

Nothing that extends from the immediate can be a part of the universe of corruption. Not only is extending from the immediate an abstract concept, it requires subservience to something abstract. Nothing tells corrupters how to live. They win by dominating, which means prevailing against everyone and everything. Adhering to the abstractions of written laws reverses the whole concept of domination.

Defying the purpose of written laws is an ethic and life-style for corrupters. To not do so would be admitting defeat and allowing subservience to the enemy.

What then is the result of that ethic and life-style? The result is something on the order of terrorists creating a "caliphate." Seldom do corrupters get to that end point, but getting half way there shows the same purposes or ethic and life-style.