The fakery of global warming science is disgusting. When raw data shows nothing, the numbers are manipulated to produce fake warming, even when modeling is not involved, and more so with modeling. Even if it saves mankind, it is not science. Call it political salvation, not science. Of course, it saves no one; it just puts incompetent corrupters in control of our lives. And then all of the science such persons produce is the same degenerate standards.

Science only exists at standards which achieve the necessary results. The purpose of science is to extend knowledge into unknown areas with reliability. People depend upon the result of science to be reliable. Without exacting standards, science cannot produce the expected reliability.

The required standards have been disappearing in science. Without those standards, science is reverting to the level of political propaganda.

There should be no social argument over climate effects. Only reliable information should be entering the social domain, which removes the controversies. Climate alarmists are pretending that the science of the subject has reached that point, and it represents their viewpoint.

Their method of argument is antithetical to proper science. They say, 97% of the scientists agree and the IPCC represents that viewpoint. That's not how science works. Agreement is how propaganda is promoted. It's impossible to get objective science out of agreement, because subjective sources of power (Agreement is a subjective concept and power source.) obstruct the objective processes of evaluating evidence.

To show a temperature increase due to a fake greenhouse effect, land measurements showed no such thing. So the raw data was adjusted for several vague reasons to show an increase. Manipulating numbers is not how science works. It isn't science unless the measurement numbers are used. There are virtually no measurement numbers in the fake science of greenhouse gases, since there is nothing to measure. Contrivance is all that exists on the subject.

A nonsensical claim that methane is a powerful greenhouse gas. What does "powerful" mean? There is no scientific concept of what a more powerful greenhouse gas would be.

Under laboratory conditions, it takes less methane to absorb radiation in a cuvette than the amount of carbon dioxide required to absorb the same intensity of radiation. If fewer molecules absorb the same amount of radiation, the substance is supposedly a stronger greenhouse gas.

There is nothing in the atmosphere that does what happens in a cuvette in a laboratory. A substance in a laboratory cuvette is not called a greenhouse gas. A greenhouse effect is something someone contrived for the atmosphere. So there is no way to transpose absorption in a cuvette into a greenhouse effect in the atmosphere.

Scientists would know this. Yet the public discourse on stronger greenhouse gases is unquestionable political position that shapes expensive social policies.

In the atmosphere, carbon dioxide absorbs all radiation available to it as the radiation travels ten meters under near-surface conditions. The same amount of methane would absorb all radiation available to it as the radiation travels a few centimeters under near-surface conditions. Increasing either one would shorten those distances. Shortening the distances does not change the temperature of the atmosphere for either one. Stronger thus becomes an irrelevancy of no consequence to anything.

Where is the scientific explanation of what stronger means? There are illogical expositions on the number of years of residence time in the atmosphere, which has no rational relationship to anything in science.

Real science doesn't transpose a cuvette measurement into a nonexistence greenhouse effect in the atmosphere. Real science accounts for the total process.

Science used to operate at higher standards than the imposed subjectivity that is being called science now days.

Beyond Science

This problem exists throughout society, which is why it entered science. Corrupt scientists are simply doing what corrupters do all the time.

The scientific standard is supposed to exist everywhere. The only difference with science is the degree of detail and boundaries of knowledge.

At all times, humans are supposed to base claims on evidence which can be evaluated by other persons. Rationality is the application of that standard. Rational persons allow other persons to evaluate what they are saying by providing enough explanation of evidence to show what the truth is.

Corrupters do not operate by that standard. They impose some propaganda claim onto people with no explanation that can be evaluated. Just trust them, while they do the evaluating for everyone else.

Behind the corrupt standard is a purpose. Corrupters actually assume that there are two methods of handling reality, and they are heroically correcting the standard that rational persons produce.

The unreal standard that corrupters produce is based on the assumption that there must be masters who do the deciding for everyone else. The masters encounter too much interference if people evaluate for themselves. So there is not supposed to be any evaluating beyond the masters.

The masters then decide everything by aligning upon their motives, which reduce down to self-contradictory whims. There is no other method for corrupters to do things, because they cannot evaluate or produce rationality due to an absence of necessary realities in their heads.

Not knowing what rationality is, corrupters assume rational persons are just making things up for their own purposes, which looks chaotic without a knowledge basis. So the master-slave relationship looks superior to corrupters. That's why they are so self-righteous and driven in promoting their perversions.

When corrupters enter science, they try to do science the same way, which is nothing resembling what science is supposed to be. Real science shows why rationality is necessary in society.

Extended Into Totalitarianism

The attempt by corrupters to extend their standard into government requires replacing government based on laws with government based upon the whims of a ruler. This purpose was what conservatives have been trying to promote since 1981 through so-called "deregulation" and "small government."

There are no regulations (laws) that conservatives respect or minimum size for their government (as laws, not as imposed corruption). Totalitarian dictatorship is the only form of government acceptable to corrupters.

Trump shows the process in a far more obnoxious way than usual. He is trying to replace objective reality with his arbitrary whims determining what reality is. The journalists only notice the lying; they don't notice the purpose of the dictator replacing objective reality with whim aligned upon his arbitrary rule.

The most extreme corrupters lie for the sake of lying in their attempt to replace objective reality that rational persons depend upon with their imposed versions of realities. It's a replacement process. The rational standard must be reduced to rubble before fake reality can be imposed.

TOP