 |
|
 |
If "survival of the fittest" is the basis of evolution, then humans should design the social order for survival of the fittest—in the most basic philosophical assumption of corrupters. Should then rationality, knowledge and constructivity applied to the solution to problems be the ruination of man? Corrupters assume so. Corrupters assume that all elements of constructivity are for fools. They convince themselves by having the purpose of convincing others. They need to convince others of that claim, because they are totally incompetent at producing rationality, knowledge and constructivity and want to get more out of life than their incompetence produces by using other methods. Mongering power through corruption is the alternative that is sought when incompetence doesn't get corrupters where they want to be. Mongering power is highly dependent upon perception. The persons at the top of the power structures need to look like winners in order to get losers to support the scheme in their ambitions to rise to the top and be winners. Being winners is supposed to be the same thing as the fittest surviving and turn the whole process into virtue instead of criminality. If the criminality is virtue, then constructivity must be for fools. Corrupters have themselves convinced that all elements of constructivity are for fools. It's in their quest to turn the world upside down. It's in the "new normal" that conservatives replaced real normal with in 1981. It's in the purpose of defeating enemies, in purifying the Arian race, in white racism, in getting rid of the worthless eaters. It's all virtue, because constructivity is for fools in the philosophy of corrupters. |
 | ||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
