political Philosophy
 
         
 
HOME Science Errors
 

 
Why Conservatives Are Always Wrong

 

Conservatives are always wrong and they always promote corruption. The simple fact of the matter is visible, as conservatives define themselves as wrong and corrupt.

When conservatives took over the world in 1981, they said they were creating a "new normal." Since normal is always assumed to be that which is right and proper, a new normal could only be that which is wrong and improper.

There are oceans of moral philosophy in trying to create a new normal. Only a small part of the information can be touched upon here.

First, conservatives recognized that they intended to create a very basic change in saying they were going to create a new normal. It was no minor adjustment that they had in mind. Normal is the foundation of everything. A new normal is analogous to gravity going upward or turning lead into gold.

Of course, conservatives assumed they were going to create an improvement. But conservatives are so ignorant that they don't realize that the foundations of existence cannot be turned upside down and still create an improvement. But most importantly, they realized that they were in conflict with the foundations of existence. Not knowing what they were saying and doing doesn't change the fact that they were talking about turning the foundations of existence upside down.

The proof is in the fact that there could not have been five thousand years of social evolution toward improved living conditions and development of science and technology without a constructive normal.

The implication which conservatives were trying to create was that liberals created the previous normal and the result was the ruination of man. Those two concepts don't fit together—not when combined with another slogan which conservatives used at the same time, which was getting rid "eighty years of liberalism going awry."

Supposedly, liberals spent eighty years (stated in 1981) corrupting the social order to such an extent that they had created normalcy through corruption doing so. Eighty years of corruption as normalcy doesn't create the modern society that evolved between 1901 and 1981.

Wasn't that when America was great the first time—coming out of WW-II, while Trump was growing up and watching "Industry On Parade" on television, when women were winning household appliances on television, when most workers were unionized, everyone with a job could buy a house and kids could pay their way through college by working, as I did? That normal needed to be changed according to conservatives.

Conservatives were saying that that history was the bad normal which needed to be replaced by the new normal. Using the word normal placed the entirety of the subject into the equation, not some side issue.

It means conservatives recognized that their conflict with something was total and basic. They continue to promote that assumption as the starting point of their purpose as conservatives. They see a conflict with opponents that is so total that it includes everything. What they miss is that nothing in existence can be so totally corrupt and therefore the conflict is in themselves and their view of existence.

The basis of totalitarianism is in that view of existence. Corrupters must oppose everything in total and replace it with their whims in total. Anything other than total requires a process of differentiation. Corrupters cannot understand what differentiation is. Once the process of differentiation exists, all elements of rationality are required and evaluations determine what truth is.

Totalitarianism erases those problems for corrupters. All complexities are flushed down the drain by erasing differentiation. Trying to change what normal is does that. It flushes everything down the drain but the whimsical purposes of conservatives. Nothing but conservative whims is supposed to remain.

 
Corruption Is An Ethic

How Power Mongering Works

What Corruption Is TOP

 

          top

Home Page
Moral Philosophy
Political Philosophy
Science Errors
   Home Page   
   Moral Philosophy   
   Political Philosophy   
   Science Errors