May 6, 2022

Corrupters are drawn to criminality for the reason rational persons outlaw criminality—the destructiveness. There are many reasons for that. Basically, it's a reversal of the logic of constructivity. Corrupters despise all elements of constructivity starting with rationality, because the demands not only leave corrupters behind but expose them for the incompetent corrupters that they are.

So reversing the complexities of constructivity is what corrupters do. And they believe in their corruptions, because corruption works for them and must therefore be the real solution to problems, in their warped view of existence.

Corrupters have a low level of awareness. They don't know what uncorrupted existence consists of. So they try to frame existence in terms of their methods of dealing with their problem.

Corruption is not a practical method of getting results. So criminality is added as the fix for getting to desired end points with corruption.

This concern was the basis of Reaganism. A "new normal" was said to be the purpose. The new normal was addition of criminality to procedures, which made corruption practical. "Morning in America," Reagan called it, because the method was his way of getting results.

Reagan broke laws as wantonly as Trump starting with getting elected by convincing Iran to not release hostages until after the election, so Carter would look like a loser. Congress went so far as to try to outlaw Reagan's war against rice farmers in Nicaragua, while Reagan defied the law by pretending that someone else was doing it.

Reaganites assumed there was no other method of getting results, since they were clueless on all elements of rationality. They assumed that rational persons were losers failing at everything and the only reason social problems existed was due to fools trying to apply rationality at standards of honesty.

So Reaganites were going to solve everyone's problems by adding criminality to their corruption. Of course, there would be losers along with winners; but nothing is perfect. So the winners had to prevail over the losers; and fighting wars is how that is done.

Corrupters assume that exploitation is a process of creating. They are only aware of the criminality element of exploitation, not where the starting point originates in creating something to be exploited. What lies outside the awareness of corrupters is not known to exist by corrupters.

This is why corrupters think nothing of pollution and toxicity. They assume pollution and toxicity are necessary elements of existence.

Consider as an example a mining operation. If no pollution is allowed, the company is out of business. But if wastes can be dumped into a stream, some persons win and some persons lose. A combination of winners and losers is viewed as superior to everyone being losers.

Corrupters get that way due to corruption producing no constructive results. Corrupters assume their problem with corruption is a universal truism—that no methodology produces constructive results, unless some criminality is added with it to get desired results. A real constructive methodology is beyond the comprehension of the more serious corrupters.