The conservative focus is like looking through a straw and seeing nothing but trivia.

Normalcy (as in the way things prove to be) requires looking at enough things at the same time to determine how one thing relates to another. It's like putting together pieces of a puzzle. The pattern has to be visible in the nearby pieces to determine what goes where. Without a pattern, there is no process.

The conservative process is devoid of a pattern. Each puzzle piece is independent of the rest of the puzzle. Each piece could be a different color. There would be no pattern, just nonsense.

Why would that be? A logic indicates several related problems. In essence, it's removal of reality from the picture. Life only exists as realities. How can realities be removed from life? That's a big question to be evaluated. But it is what the problem is in dealing with conservatives.

Since whys always are too big of a question to entirely be answered, the starting point needs some more attention. What conservatives do is pick and chose micro realities out of a grab bag of assumptions and use them to prove monumental claims.

The purpose is close to universally the same in all instances. It's to prove that liberals are the ruination of man, while leaving nothing but conservatives as the answer by default. It's so humble to take the default position; it takes care of itself when eliminating everything else.

The mechanism isn't just a bit of low-level brilliance. Brilliance would need a large and correct context. There is no context to create a positive characterization.

In fact, conservatives believe in their stunt. Believing in something says that it contains their awareness domain. In other words, they don't know there is something wrong with their pattern of analysis.

The awareness domain consists of a grab bag of assumptions (theoretically, all warped and tainted by motives) and picking out the ones that serve a purpose. By picking and choosing, any claim can be bolstered as supposed proven fact.

Even though this explanation raises more questions than answers, the starting point needs to be where the concern lies. The starting point is that life must look like a real puzzle picture with a coherent image, not the scramble of micro pieces lacking coherent relationships to anything that conservatives produce.

To not see the problem is preposterous. Conservatives are preposterous. The reason why is because they are not looking at the realities as relevant. Realities are nothing but tools to be used against enemies in their world.

It's analogous to buying an automobile, taking it apart and using the parts for other purposes, such as paper weights, planters and door stops. The original design is reduced to dissociated trivia.

That result can only occur when something else is a greater concern than the realities. That something else is highly visible, as conservatives are driven to defeat enemies. They need to be winners by making their enemies losers.

One of the things it means is that someone else has to put together the realities of life and make things work. It takes a lot of rationality, knowledge and constructivity to put together the realities of life for functionality and solving problems. Conservatives are disconnected from the process and don't know it.

This explanation would normally look like so many absurd claims; but the result is visible in every word produced by conservatives (that is, usual conservatives, allowing for exceptions to everything). They cannot produce any other standard of communication because of their incompetence and obsession which disconnects them from realities and replaces rationality with an attack upon enemies.

Look at any communication of theirs and you will see nothing but micro trivia. It couldn't be relevant if it were true. But conservatives see the trivia as everything, because they depend upon it to prove that their enemies are the ruination of man.

With that purpose, the trivia doesn't look like trivia to conservatives. It is their livelihood and ticket to success. It's only trivia in the reality world where significance is determined by relationships between realities.

Consider some examples of trivia. Reagan was obsessed with a war against communism. To fight that war, he tried to destroy Nicaragua, which didn't even have a military force; so some criminals were used to murder rice farmers.

A recent example is some supposed "deep state" spying on Trump's campaign. The internet describes spying as collecting information. Something more than that seems to be needed to create an Earth-shaking result. There is always something that goes with the collecting of information, unless professional investigators are doing preliminary work. What was the follow-up? None has been described. So the claim is trivial regardless of any connected realities. If there were connected realities, they would have been on the billboards.

The total absence of any conceivable consequence is close enough to definitive trivia. Yet the Trump Administration is trying to turn hell over to create a significance.

The issue of spying on Trump's campaign is supposed to negate the impeachment and show that it was sedition. The impeachment proved that Trump defied campaign laws with criminal intent—a common method of keeping totalitarian dictators in power, which is of Earth-shaking significance.