January 30, 2022

No evidence is given for greenhouse gases existing, because corruption is imposed, not explained. I explain the evidence that greenhouse gases don't exist, because human life cannot be sustained on fraud. Which one rules?

That's the difference between democracy and the approaching Nazism. Fraudulent authorities say, just trust us, with no evidence provided.

It's also how Trump and sycophants promote the big lie that Biden stole the election. They say the process was fraud. What evidence do they provide? None what-so-ever. Supposedly, accusations springing from motives should replace ten thousand years of evolved procedures for democratic government.

A worker driving a plumber's truck was stopped and assaulted based on the assumption that he was carrying fake voting ballots. None were found. Shouldn't there be a method of determining proper standards?

The factor that defines Trump's standard is the black hole from which his assumptions originate. Deriving realities from a black hole devoid of realities is the difference between rational existence, such as democracy, and the criminality replacing ordered existence of Nazism. Yet the same standard exists in physics as in the increasing Nazism.

Physicists draw conclusions on the supposed basis of complex math. There is no such math. The complexity of physics math is nothing but fakery for removing accountability from physics.

Physicists can't add and subtract. They never read each other's publications, because there is nothing but nonsense in them. That fact can be stated as a truism, because there has not been an iota of basic physics correctly produced since Newton's laws in 1687. Science errors do not produce correct math.

After physicists make their fraudulent proclamations, know-nothing journalists force the results onto the public. Renewable energy is said to be on par with coal. What does on par mean? No one needs to know, because fraud is imposed, not explained.

When renewables of the solar and wind type become a few percent of the electricity, the cost of electricity to consumers increases by a factor of 3 or 4, as occurrred in California. When such renewables reach 15% of electrical sources—the maximum anyone can achieve—the cost of electricity is increased by a factor of ten, as occurred in Germany and England. The cost there became more than 40¢ per kwh, where coal should be 4¢ per kwh.

Why the extreme expense for something that is on par with coal? Only because frauds are disconnected from the accountability that explained evidence produces.

Physicists claim there is 3.7 watts per square meter less radiation leaving the Earth than entering from the sun with each doubling of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. That claim means there is a stable disequilibrium in energy flows. There is no such thing as a stable disequilibrium in energy flows into and out of the Earth from the sun.

The claimed 3.7 w/m² is converted into 1°C by reversing the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. Watts do not produce a stable result; they produce a constantly changing result, as they indicate rate of addition. That's why people pay for watt-hours of electricity instead of watts. But physicists needed fake math, so they used the Stefan-Boltzmann constant which required that result.

Another problem is that doubling the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere from one molecule to two molecules would increase the temperature of the whole atmosphere by 1°C, which means the fake equation has no meaning. Physicists needed fake math to create an appearance of science, while there was no science involved—not an iota different from Trump's black hole claiming fraud in election results.

The most stupid thing about 1°C temperature increase is that it was that temperature 70 miles farther south. You don't get droughts and floods from the temperature that always exists 70 miles farther south. Nature doesn't have a good-line bad-line at 1°C. California doesn't turn into a desert at 1°C increase, while Cologne Germany turns into a swamp. The drought of the "dirty thirties" didn't turn Kansas into a desert.

That's on top of the fact that the 1°C increase doesn't exist. It's theorized from fake math, while measurements don't show it.

Opinions And Evidence

It's normal and constructive to express opinions. An opinion represents oneself, whatever one's views are worth.

Secondly it's normal and constructive to increase reality through criticism, as much as corrupters oppose criticism. Criticism means pointing out evidence that people can evaluate for themselves.

But corrupters don't just represent their opinions or produce evidence-based criticism. What they do is use force and violence to impose realities. Force and violence is what Trump's fascists are showing us. And it is the general method that conservatives impose upon society. They don't just explain with evidence; they use generated forces to impose their realities upon society.

An example is affirmative action, which was used to get more minority persons into the universities. Conservatives are dead certain that they are the protectors of truth and justice, because they insist that the persons with the highest grades must get ahead of chosen minorities.

The problem is that they don't use evidence to justify their claims. Instead, they take over social structures and impose their results in defiance and contempt.

Grades are 90% fraud. The first reason is because corrupters demand and get know-nothing exams such as true-and-false or multiple choice questions. Another reason is because the education system is based largely on memorization. Those who do nothing but memorize know nothing of the subject matter afterwards.

The lily white education process goes through the routines of memorizing nonsense, such as Shakespeare, so thoroughly that they beat out lower class students on such exams without knowing a thing.

Why not then do a correction by making them answer thought questions? They rebel and disallow it.

The point is not that there is a provable position with disputes but that corrupters assume there is and their position is the only correct position. That's why Trump's fascists are so self-righteous in attempting to overthrow the government.

The point is that corrupters do not go through the only valid method of determining what reality is by explaining evidence. Truth evolves through the interaction of realities; so there is forward progress in explaining evidence. The absence of that process, rationality, in imposing results upon society is why the social order is disintegrating into Nazism.

Corrupters believe in their corruptions. It is what conservatives meant in saying they were producing "a new normal" when they took over the world in 1981. Their new normal was to replace rationality with the imposition of their motives. They believe in it. Reagan said, "If you have to explain, you are already a loser." That means they have no respect for rationality as the explanation of evidence.

Look at any word conservatives produce. You will never see evidence for claims. Evidence defeats them. You will see lies. The difference is in the explanations. How did Biden steal the election? There is no method for doing so. The method conservatives are trying to use to steal elections is to prevent low class persons from voting. Low class persons stand in lines for hours, while lily white power mongers walk in and out.