Moral Philosophy
 
         
 
HOME Science Errors
 

 
The Anti-Reality Mind-Frame

 

September 5, 2020

Corruption creates an anti-reality mind-frame. The nature of corruption doesn't evaluate the way rationality evaluates. This is why persons who try to figure out corrupters can never make sense of the subject. Critics look for a rationale, but rationality principles do not apply to corruption.

The anti-reality mind-frame is an inverting flip on rationality. After the flip, various degrees of extremism develop. When significantly developed, the result is viewed as a 180 degree change in views. Corrupters will sometimes mention the 180 degrees of difference, because they see the two extremes as opposites.

In its mildest form, anti-reality simply looks like irrationality, as if the result could be corrected. But the perpetrators refuse to be corrected. It isn't that the truth could not be explained to them; it's that they choose to do a flip on logic as a quick fix to their problems.

Corrupters would never make the decision to flip reality upside down or opposite of truth on their own. They are drawn into that sphere by other corrupters who view things that way.

The attraction of flipping reality to anti-reality is that it is much easier to do than producing rationality. It's an escape from the demands that can never be met in producing rationality.

The flip is rationalized as opposing a wrong as a solution to problems. The end result is obvious as the constant war against enemies that corrupters produce. Why can't they be talked out of it? Because it is a substitute for rationality as the solution to problems.

The basic mechanism is to assume something can be destroyed as the solution to problems. It is in fact no different than the war mentality. Who would fight a war by constructing something? Wars are fought by destroying things.

So the anti-reality logic is simply to view life as a war where destroying something is the answer, and most of what needs to be destroyed is the reality of opponents. Opponents are supposedly less of a problem if their realities are destroyed, just as a military force is less of a problem if it's hardware is destroyed.

Once a corrupter makes a commitment to the anti-reality standard, all that followers requires more and more anti-reality, because opponents are created faster than they can be destroyed.

The reason why corrupters don't change directions is because they already found that they are losers where rationality needs to be produced, but they become a different type of winners in the anti-reality world of other corrupters. They get support from other corrupters, which makes them part of a like-minded group, where they can never be part of a group of rational persons demanding ever more perfect rationality.

The complaint of corrupters is often seen as just that. They are defeating a bunch of persons who demand more and more of something. The something must be misrepresented, so anything negative can be applied to the principle.

Corrupters are constantly talking about the freedom which they can never seem to achieve. They constantly have a force acting upon them telling them that they are doing something wrong. Since they certainly are doing something wrong, the more they try to succeed, the less freedom they have.

Obviously, the mind frame lacks a degree of credibility. There is a certain amount of stupidity that must precede all corruption.

This path and purpose is why a logical explanation cannot be found in the problem that corrupters have. They chose a path that reverses rationality as a quick fix to their problems.

Opposed To Complexities

Since corrupters are opposed to realities, they are opposed to the complexities that realities create. The word "swamp" is a dead give-away. Swamp is supposed to indicate too much complexity. Draining the swamp is the equivalent of returning to the stone age.

But the swamp isn't drained by pulling a plug on realities; it is drained by getting rid of the rational world which creates complex realities. Corrupters attack persons as the supposed answer to their problems. Swamp is a group of persons.

For rational persons, complexity is no problem. Each person contributes something that adds up to a greater whole. Specialists work on different elements of every task.

That method is not acceptable to corrupters because of their motive of mongering power to dominate. Power cannot be acquired and used to dominate by contributing an element to a process. Corrupters need to get the whole of everything under their control in order to dominate through power.

Complexities prevent corrupters from doing that. So corrupters are reductionists. They try to reduce everything to a simple level which allows nothing to evade their control of whole processes.

The task is the same as the need to homogenize, as racism does. Complexities cause realities to interact, while truth evolves out of interacting realities and creates accountability.

Realities create complexity; forces simplify. Replacing realities with forces allows corrupters to control process by preventing complexities from evading their grasp.
 
The Essence Of Fascism

Fascism occurs when the persons who promote the counter-reality mind-frame overwhelm a society. There is no reality element to the result. The result is chaos due to an absence of stable realities.

The purposes of corrupters when taking over a social order is not to create an alternative but to attack what previously existed, since corrupters are against everything and for nothing. The driving force is the power to impose, dominate and destroy. The method of attack is primarily to accuse.

A simplistic routine is used. All problems are attributed to the other side, which means the rational world, even though it is the corrupters who create the problems. The corrupters then claim to be the solution, which requires destroying the rational world as the supposed problem.

 
Corruption Is An Ethic

How Power Mongering Works

What Corruption Is TOP

 

          top

Home Page
Moral Philosophy
Political Philosophy
Science Errors
   Home Page   
   Moral Philosophy   
   Political Philosophy   
   Science Errors