 |
|
 |
August 3, 2020 Reductionistic attack is a twist on criticism used by destructive personality types. Trying to fit attack into the place where criticism belongs creates incoherence. There is not enough recognition of the difference in society. Criticism exists because of the need to determine essential realities where there are problems. Using reductionistic attack for that purpose not only corrupts the reality, it destroys the process needed for determining what objective reality is. It's analogous to taking guns to school and creating a shoot-out as a method of studying history. Force and violence are not methods of determining what reality is. The difference is a question of standards, which means the methods which are use. The destructive methods of attack substituting for criticism include lying and disruptiveness which prevent corrections from being made. The degree of misrepresentation overwhelms the process, so corrections can never keep up. The purpose of reductionistic attack is to degrade opponents. Destructive methods are used for degradation. There is nothing respectable about that purpose. What makes reductionistic attack most destructive is that it is wedged into the place of criticism where realities need to be clarified. Not only do the realities not get clarified, the audience is more vulnerable trying to clarify realities. The method of communication doesn't look the same for the two purposes. Virtually opposite methods are used. Where explanations are needed, charged words, name-calling and lies are used with no clarifications. The methodology for corrupters is to start at the end point. A lie is chosen as the desired purpose. Then rationalizations for the lie are concocted in an unrealistic manner. The logic consists of non sequiturs. The lies are not inobvious in being the opposite of the truth. At some levels, such as journalism, a long-winded explanation will be used to make connections between a fraudulent end point and fake subject matter. Under less sophisticated circumstances, idiotic logic will be used. At the lowest possible level, where Trump operates, any lie, promoted with two or three words, is the totality of the attack. At that standard, the subject is not about objective realities that need to be developed; it's about the persons who reduce discussions to an attack mode. Nothing can move forward under such conditions. But journalists don't deal with the problem of the persons, as if all methods of communication were equally valid. So the destructive persons have nothing to lose in destroying opponents through attack. Journalists try to work through destructive methods of communication, but they need to be more corrective, not only by requiring explanations, which they sometimes do, but by stating that the methods of communication are not suitable. Corrupters assume they are superior in attacking opponents, because all objective reality results in truth which seems like an attack by corrupters and often is a legitimate attack. So corrupters are simply reversing the attack. That would be normal, if they were using respectable standards of communication to promote their concern. But being totally incapable of producing rationality, they assume lying degradation is the more realistic way to promote their motives. It’s like the difference between taking guns to school and taking books to school. All bottom dwellers make similar assumptions and assume there is something heroic in changing social standards to methods they can win at. Winning at force and violence where there is supposed to be communication of complex realities is a breakdown of human existence. Who is supposed to make life possible for such degenerates? The communists? |
 | ||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
