Moral Philosophy
 
         
 
HOME Science Errors
 

 
Representation Is Too Abstract For Incompetents
 

To represent something with words is an abstract process. Incompetents cannot produce abstract realities. They allow forces, motives and reactions to replace the knowledge that is needed to determine the meaning of abstractions.

An example is the definition of words. A definition is supposed to represent something. Incompetents cannot use words to properly represent realities, because they cannot apply the abstract meaning that definitions require.

Improper representations will always create disagreements. So the tendency is to assume that a disagreement is a common problem, perhaps due to differing values or experiences. But there is a wrongness that should not exist when incompetents are misrepresenting. There is no excuse for being wrong in claims regardless of values or purposes. It occurs due to an inability to properly represent by incompetent persons, which makes them corrupters of realities.

With no ability to properly represent things, incompetent corrupters align their words upon motives. They assume their motives are justifiable, so tailoring claims to the motives should be justifiable. But they are wrong. They produce falsehoods without proper representation. It is not ok to degrade people and their realities with falsehoods as a method of opposing them.

Using click bait to represent stories results from an inability to properly represent. The persons who do that don't know that they are misrepresenting. They assume they are drawing attention to something by dramatizing.

With no concept of what proper representation should be, corrupters align claims upon their motives. Generally, they are either for or against something. When for something, they build it up regardless of the logic or common sense. When they oppose something, they degrade with false claims. The results do not align upon objective realities but upon motives.

The appearance is that corrupters are trying to get by with something which is in conflict with reality and not justifiable. But they don't know that the conflict with reality exists, because they cannot align one reality upon another to determine proper representation. Instead, they use positive and negative claims to build up or tear down based upon motives.

 

          top

Home Page
Moral Philosophy
Science Errors
Home Page
Moral Philosophy
Science Errors