Science is too demanding for the incompetents who have taken control over it. But incompetents do not understand what science is supposed to be, so they blissfully impose their corruptness onto science.

A standard corruption of physics is the isolation of effects from surrounding influences, so complexities can be handled more easily. Science does not allow that standard. Science is a study of what actually exists in nature, and nothing in nature exists in isolation from surrounding influences.

Physics is totally math, not because logic is irrelevant but because math is a method of stripping openness and accountability from the subject. There is so much error in physics that none of it will stand up to criticism.

Math cannot account for the interacting complexities of physics. Dynamic systems include too much randomness to reduce to math. The result is fake analyses with no relationship to objective reality.

Isolated analysis is a crutch for dealing with overwhelming complexity. It's a reductionistic analysis used as a method of simplifying. In essence, incompetents strip single effects out from complexities and analyze them without the necessary concern for the rest of the complexities.

This standard is the exclusive methodology in physics and common elsewhere in science. Physicists cannot account for the complexities which they deal with due to the abstract nature of the subject in addition to an absence of correct science to apply to the subject. So they evaluate isolated effects as if they were not influenced by the complexities that make up natural effects.

Climatology is too complex for scientific analysis, and still, isolated analysis is applied to the subject. The factors which are omitted for consideration include the fact that radiation is emitted as fast as it is absorbed by so-called greenhouse gases. The nature of equilibrium is omitted from analysis. It will sometimes be mentioned but not accounted for in quantitation, not the least reason being that equilibrium is normally too complex to quantitate.

When analysis omits the complexities, it has no relationship to what happens in nature. At such a standard, physics does nothing more than add garbage on top of garbage for complex analysis.

It seems strange that the inappropriateness of stripping context from analysis is ignored through most of science and its related religions and propaganda as it diffuses through the public. The omitted effects are extremely visible. How can omitting the essence of complex analysis create such a sacred standard everywhere?