Science doesn't happen the way global warming does. In real science, disputes are very small. All problems and errors get corrected. But not in Climatology, because the standards required for moving forward are gone.

The origins of this problem are in physics. Physics is so abstract and difficult to study that errors could not be corrected. This allowed incompetent power mongers to take over physics and shove out real scientists. The controllers do not operate by constructive standards.

Humans evolved concepts of what constructive standards should be. The difference between constructivity and destructivity are definable.

The number one problem, something like 90% of the problem, is stating claims with no explanation which would allow clarification or verification. This standard of communication is the overwhelming problem with all corruption. The minute an explanation exists, all else follows. An evolution of truth is the invariable consequence.

This is why corrupters will not explain. They cannot accept the truth of the subject. Instead they attempt to railroad a subject based upon their superiority. So they spend all of their time building up their credentials and infallibility and then make proclamations which cannot be questioned.

This tactic is an improper method of communicating on any subject. All claims need to be explained to determine what they are based upon and what the truth is.

The problem of standards stems from the motives. If the motive is to corrupt, the explanations are missing. If the motive is to clarify, explanations are an inseparable part of the process.

The global warming issue never moves forward, because the claims can never be pinned down. Supposedly, the science is settled, and 97% of the scientists could not be wrong. On that basis, critics are not allowed to exist. They are removed from science, web sites and journalism. (How the Firing Works)

The standards are the starting point. Nothing can move forward until they are corrected.