Physicists base their assumptions of energy in fusion reactions on Einstein's equation, E=mc² (Energy equals mass-loss times velocity of light squared.). A scientific origin for the equation does not exist. It came off the top of Einstein's head. Einstein paralleled the equation for kinetic energy, KE=½mv².

There was no reason for Einstein to create the equation besides paralleling the kinetic energy equation, KE=½mv².

Elsewhere, I show, through simple and unquestionable mathematics, that the equation which defines kinetic energy is wrong. Therefore, Einstein paralleled a false definition of energy.

Real kinetic energy is simply momentum, mv. Momentum transforms into other forms of energy with conservation, while ½mv² does not.

To parallel the correct equation, Einstein should have said, E=mc without squaring the velocity of light. There is a huge difference in the end result when the velocity of light is squared compared to nonsquared.

This error creates a false expectation of a lot of energy in nuclear fusion, as the velocity of light (c) squared produces a vastly larger number than unsquared. Whenever anyone looks for energy in a fusion reaction, it's not there.

When nothing can move at velocity squared, it's energy cannot be represented with velocity squared. When nothing about a moving mass increases exponentially, nothing about its properties can be represented with exponential increase. When physicists don't know that, they don't know what science is. They are nothing but exploiters of garbage mathematics for mongering power.

Two tests of fusion were successful in everything but getting significant energy. One was the JET test with tokamak design (magnetic containment), and the other was the laser method, which was totally successful, except almost no energy was yielded.

So-called hydrogen bombs show a similar result. Wikipedia said in 2016 on hydrogen bombs, "most of its destructive energy comes from uranium fission rather than fusion." (The statement later disappeared in muddle.) Why not more fusion in the end-all weapon? It is not logical that any fusion occurs in so-called hydrogen bombs, because getting the conditions right for fusion is so demanding experimentally that the chaos of an explosion is not a credible method of achieving it. Why would most of the energy in a hydrogen bomb come from fission instead of fusion? Why bother with a small amount of fusion, when it is supposed to be the superior source of energy? The obvious reason is because there is no significant energy from fusion.

All of this evidence indicates that the assumption of fusion in the center of stars is total imagination. The heat of stars would be a result of fission reactions, not fusion.

Addendum: August 21, 2021

Maybe that is progress; but guess what: If a chain reaction occurred, much like a fission reaction, all elements of the reaction should have existed, while the magical energy wasn't there.

The net effect shows that when the matter is converted to energy, there is no significant energy there. The result did nothing more than the chain reaction of fission nuclear reactions.

The difference is this: The whole purpose of seeking fusion energy is to convert matter into energy by Einstein's formula which says E=mc². Converting matter into energy is supposed to produce vastly more energy than a chain reaction does.

The conversion of matter into energy should have occurred in the latest experiment due to a chain reaction occurring. Why then was there no net energy gain? The result shows that the conversion of matter into energy is a joke, because Einstein's equation is a joke.

(The link at the source is broken, as new absurdities replace previous claims; so I unlinked the source.)

Absurd Procedure And Claims Physicists repeat the laser experiment over and over, adding more energy input each time and claiming to get more energy out each time. There is no such thing as a partial effect. If there were some net increase in energy added to the input energy creating a compounded effect, it would cause the reaction to go to completion. That means there is no such thing as stopping part way through the process. The ungodly amount of energy that is focussed onto a minute point is not proper logic. There is no difficulty in get a fusion reaction to occur. It either occurs or it doesn't. Plus or minus. The amount of energy added is unrelated to the amount of fusion reaction that occurs. That means there is absurd logic in claiming some energy is added to the nuclear reaction. There is no such concept in physics that energy added to a fusion reaction will increase the fusion reaction. All of the energy is supposed to be in the reaction, not an external source. Rationalizing fraud is that way. It's illogical and incremental, as if mysterious absurdities get to a desired end point. An incremental improvement is needed to rationalize endless, expensive experiments, while there is nothing incremental about the fusion reaction.

(Einstein is portrayed as some sort of wizard of physics because of his conclusions coming off the top of his head. When other physicists don't know where his conclusions came from, they assume he is more intelligent than they are. One of the problems is that science doesn't exist without a method of measurement. No measurement, no science. There is no measurement in Einstein's conclusions.

The same result exists everywhere corrupters amass their power. Their power is based upon disconnect from objective reality. Those who can disconnect their fakery from reality the most completely are viewed as the answer to everything through wizardry.

Demagogues acquire their power that way. They get corrupters to support their frauds when their claims are so disconnected from reality that no one can prove them wrong through rationality. To rational persons, being disconnect from reality is being wrong; but corrupters are too stupid to know whether claims are disconnected from reality. So they aggregate around frauds such as Einstein or demagogues such as Trump and Hitler.)

Relativity Fraud

What Corruption Is

TOP